Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastUltima
Results 1 to 10 of 108
  1. #1
    THE AVERAGE USER L'avatar di Errecinque
    Date Of Registration
    Mar 2014
    Messages
    909

    opinion the map opel corsa 1.3 70 HP

    I have tried to transfer the knowledge learned on the forum of this, "blessed " ecu marelli. I think I've hit on all the limiters out of the driver but I'm not sure to be able to interpret in the correct direction, the reading of the various maps and correct increases from the right for a map that is not too thrust (and series) . To you the word thanks

    http://www.professionalchiptuning.ne...er.php?u=16982
    File Allegati File Attachments
    Last edited by msport (exil77grande); 24-01-2015 to 17:09

  2. #2
    THE AVERAGE USER L'avatar di Errecinque
    Date Of Registration
    Mar 2014
    Messages
    909
    Sorry I was wrong the link of the file ori


    http://www.professionalchiptuning.ne...tml#post105228

  3. #3
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    May 2014
    The resort
    Brescia
    Messages
    251
    if I can happy to help you out for? do not take for liquid gold to what I say
    I rely on what I understood, and my (limited experience), then you may also overlook a couple of discourses
    then let's go in order of address

    well the egr

    the first limiter have increased all of, what? also a little more? 1000 rpm
    personally I would like to begin by the second bp (1190) gradually, and then I would give an increase in percentage rather than fixed (for example, 15-20%)
    ah this map has the x-axis inverted

    on advances I still have to do the tests, then I don't know exactly
    this also has the x-axis reversed, in fact, have increased at medium-low iq

    the injection times are correct, according to miles, the wear on the engine in general I would say that at the top smokes a p?
    the only thing, but ? a personal opinion, I prefer to go to percentages rather than quantity? fixed, perhaps by giving increments to the pyramid in order to have more? only where I need it (not ? said that is correct, but I am fine cos?)

    I see a bit that should be for the rail pressure, but in the other discussion honestly I still don't understand if ? only one or two (and this in the case ? the second)

    the other two limiters also with the x-axis inverted
    the same speech before, I would give it a percentage, and not less than 1250 rpm, with a minimum of gradualit?

    the lambda I never touch sincerely, even why? if you tap on the injection time, the ecu should not notice that fact? is entering the pi? diesel
    however, in the case approfondirei a moment calculations rather than traslarle brutally at the top

    another bit of the rail to the correct

    limiter rail pressure turbo, the value of the fact ? beyond the demand of the pressure, but maybe I would have given a little more?

    rail pressure, as an increase in the maximum we, for? at intermediate values, no one forbids you to go over (remember, in the case of a review of the limiters)

    limiter rail pressure for water temperature, why? have you changed the axis but not the map?

    limiter rail pressure temperature fuel ok

    maps pedal honestly, I did not understood exactly how to touch them, I think it will go a p? also the taste, but the increases seem to me to be a p? excessive

    limiter torque for water temperature, the same speech, parts from rpm pi? high, and in this case, however, the increase seems to me a little

    4 torque limiters usual speech, these have the x-axis in the right direction

    it lacks the torque limiter temperature diesel (just after the 4 limiters, which I have just spoken)

    to 064C4A missing the limiter minimum iq (zoom in and why? ? very low)
    from what I understand if you raise the rail you have to adjust this because? go to work in an area where the quantity? minimum ? zero

  4. #4
    THE AVERAGE USER L'avatar di Errecinque
    Date Of Registration
    Mar 2014
    Messages
    909
    Citazione Originally Written by Exelion1986 Visualizza Messaggio
    if I can happy to help you out for? do not take for liquid gold to what I say
    I rely on what I understood, and my (limited experience), then you may also overlook a couple of discourses
    then let's go in order of address

    well the egr

    the first limiter have increased all of, what? also a little more? 1000 rpm
    personally I would like to begin by the second bp (1190) gradually, and then I would give an increase in percentage rather than fixed (for example, 15-20%)
    ah this map has the x-axis inverted

    on advances I still have to do the tests, then I don't know exactly
    this also has the x-axis reversed, in fact, have increased at medium-low iq

    the injection times are correct, according to miles, the wear on the engine in general I would say that at the top smokes a p?
    the only thing, but ? a personal opinion, I prefer to go to percentages rather than quantity? fixed, perhaps by giving increments to the pyramid in order to have more? only where I need it (not ? said that is correct, but I am fine cos?)

    I see a bit that should be for the rail pressure, but in the other discussion honestly I still don't understand if ? only one or two (and this in the case ? the second)

    the other two limiters also with the x-axis inverted
    the same speech before, I would give it a percentage, and not less than 1250 rpm, with a minimum of gradualit?

    the lambda I never touch sincerely, even why? if you tap on the injection time, the ecu should not notice that fact? is entering the pi? diesel
    however, in the case approfondirei a moment calculations rather than traslarle brutally at the top

    another bit of the rail to the correct

    limiter rail pressure turbo, the value of the fact ? beyond the demand of the pressure, but maybe I would have given a little more?

    rail pressure, as an increase in the maximum we, for? at intermediate values, no one forbids you to go over (remember, in the case of a review of the limiters)

    limiter rail pressure for water temperature, why? have you changed the axis but not the map?

    limiter rail pressure temperature fuel ok

    maps pedal honestly, I did not understood exactly how to touch them, I think it will go a p? also the taste, but the increases seem to me to be a p? excessive

    limiter torque for water temperature, the same speech, parts from rpm pi? high, and in this case, however, the increase seems to me a little

    4 torque limiters usual speech, these have the x-axis in the right direction

    it lacks the torque limiter temperature diesel (just after the 4 limiters, which I have just spoken)

    to 064C4A missing the limiter minimum iq (zoom in and why? ? very low)
    from what I understand if you raise the rail you have to adjust this because? go to work in an area where the quantity? minimum ? zero
    First of all, thanks for having dedicated a p? your time to analyze my files.

    Then the first lim. You say that it should be read from right to left and then started to increase from the second bp starting from the right. In essence, the max value I can 4688 rpm right? I changed

    Advances....changed the meaning of mod, and calculated.

    Tomorrow, I finish again, and the place

    Thanks again

  5. #5
    THE AVERAGE USER L'avatar di Errecinque
    Date Of Registration
    Mar 2014
    Messages
    909
    Continue editing the file:
    After advances other 2 limiters latest, starting from 2 BP from the RIGHT
    The lambda that I didn't know this ecu were already? moddate in the file that is read by the car and then I leave it so?. Remittances ori
    Limiter rail fboost I was wrong on the calculation raised to 215 (1514 BAR)
    The Rail f(h20) who had moddato above the map rail (130 fixed on the whole map) was raised to 130 the break after the last curve: reported ori
    To intuition, this map does not need to touch it right ? the values indicate a prex rail low for low temp water up to 75% pedal true?
    Maps The Pedal ?? also these are to be read reversed on the X-axis ? in the first max torque at 2750 rpm? and why? that bounce in the last 2 curves ?
    Limiter torque for water temperature....it was already? moddata cos? ... I do not understand the BP factors conv ? The y-axis goes from 3750 to 18750 0 why? ? As is to be read?Not changed for now
    The last 4 limiters updated with the addition of the fourth
    I saw the last map to 064C4A but I don't know how to raise it...
    I attach a file up to date
    File Allegati File Attachments
    Last edited by msport (exil77grande); 24-01-2015 to 17:16

  6. #6
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    May 2014
    The resort
    Brescia
    Messages
    251
    in order to address

    the first limiter attention, you started again from the first bp
    as an idea for? we

    advance I think we can be the change cos?, for? personally I have not tested yet

    the other two limiters would give the same percentage increase than the one before, maybe on the second bp 10% and then 20%

    limiter rail to t the water I know that I made the casino and at the moment I don't have the conversion factor right
    the only thing I am sure of ? the axis of the temperatures? in fact they are low, probably as you say, you do not need to touch it

    the foot pedal ? still excessive, the x-axis ? in the right direction, for the shape that I could not tell you, according to me, the marelli drugs
    in any case, the maximum torque required ? 1750

    torque limiter for t the water when the edit is the same argument as before, the spins are in the clear ? strange that steps away from 3750 to 18000 for? I have seen them all done so?
    the 0 is pi? part of the bp but bens? the map itself

    4 limiters in series you started too soon, the second bp was only for the other, you always have to watch what c'? on the axes, you in fact started to increase to 800 to 900 rpm

    the limiter for t diesel personally I would prefer to increases in %

    map 064C4A:
    size 16x1
    x = value * 2 - 100 = p rail Bar
    z = value * 0,002941 = mm3 minimum
    simply raises the same value as the last two bits are set to 0

    system these two things and then test it on the road

  7. #7
    THE AVERAGE USER L'avatar di Errecinque
    Date Of Registration
    Mar 2014
    Messages
    909
    Ok I would say that reviewing pi? times the map I should be. For? I'm at the point I put ori the map 10x16 torque limiter #2 as it is called in the ecm as the axes indicate or low temperatures or very high. should be a map of torque during the engine warming, therefore, should not serve to change it if you don't have starting problems.

    Hello

  8. #8
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Jan 2013
    Messages
    226
    by changing the map, the machine changes also hot

  9. #9
    THE AVERAGE USER L'avatar di Errecinque
    Date Of Registration
    Mar 2014
    Messages
    909
    Citazione Originally Written by dariuccio Visualizza Messaggio
    by changing the map, the machine changes also hot
    For? the bp indicate the temp up to 10 ?C, and the last of more than 100?C. you Say that leaving the golds I go to cut the increases given to other limiters?

  10. #10
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Jan 2013
    Messages
    226
    I think of you, I still don't understand myself how it should be interpreted, but from the tests I did the map in general ? influenced a lot from this map.

Page 1 of 11 123 ... LastUltima

Tags for This Discussion

Write permission

  • You you can not post new threads
  • You you can not send answers
  • You you can not send attachments
  • You you can not edit your posts
  •