it goes really well....the gt2260vk ? just a nice toyit just feels that starts to pump at high rpm, without the "close"...bravo
it goes really well....the gt2260vk ? just a nice toy
For the street it's better than on tour, in the fifth gear 2 bars makes them at 2300 rpm about, also on the bench in the last roll had a little air is sucked in the bottom, and then the lambda is limited, to street injects 115mm3 at 2200 rpm about having lowered the lambda. In this way, as soon as you throw down? inject it all at once even if it has no air, and rather is a smoke home and that's all..Originally Written by mariodarkblue
it goes really well....the gt2260vk ? just a nice toy
I came up to 0.6 lambda but now I got a p? to preserve the clutch and flywheel. I have also used other tricks to make it more? responsive why? with the map informed c'? that delay which the ecu to read 100% throttle, and then in gear it loses a p? compared to the map deceived.
as you advance jack if you have to give me a tip for a gp130 the original, what would you say? with 100mm3 would you give 2 degrees to all the laps, or after the 4000rpm the lasceresti stock?
On a gp 1.9 with stock turbo I wouldn't give never 100mm3, or at least not at 4000 rpm. Too fragile turbo but especially collectors. Sar? was lame, even to me but one that I did with 90mm3,1700 bar, 0.1 in most of the turbo and lambda 1 (it was 90mm3 up to 4600 rpm approximately) in 3 days has cracked manifolds. Count that with the exhaust tip on the bottom limiter left the patches on the road.
Anyway back to the question with 100mm3 I would give more? 2 degrees, I would put 22.5/23 degrees at 4000 and 26.5/27 to 4500 if you want to keep that shot up to 4500, and more.
Consider that with 95mm3, turbo, plus 1.7/1.8 4000 I made 206 hp rolled on a gp 1.9.
My advice ? to give 90mm3 with stock turbo and 0.1 in most,lambda 1.05 and 1.1 after the 4000. Better to get it cut in the top for safety. That's what I've done so? has 86mm3 it seems to me to 4000 rpm and are on the 185 hp in theory.
but with the fap is not advised to never go under 1200 in the map? it seems to me that sandromarciano wrote there? some time ago, correct me if I'm wrong
I remember he told 1.13 in fact, I put it cos? and I'm not having any problem of more frequent regenerations
about you have problems with the map informed I believe that the problems are due to torque limiters individual that I found on the damos edc16c39....there are both the lim torque, in seconds, that the single ones..on the damos of the quaver in my possession, for example, I found one set at 320nm...while the function of time and without 50 nm according to....
A rider does not create queues even in the car...
a automoblista create queues even on a motorcycle...
The second that you said I think that is the bit corresponding to the increase in torque per second. For? I will say that I have not touched and still I have no problems reattivit? with the map informed. The other limiter I don't know what you mean but I don't think it is necessary. There are also a couple of bits at the 500-510nm but they are useless and alzandoli to me ? went to the error asr-esp-abs.
The limiters diesel lift up to 100mm3 are 2 or 3 depending on the file, to go beyond, there are other 2 or 3, depends on how many were in the first file. To go beyond 110mm3 ce n'? another. In total, there are 6.
The only map that I never understood ? the first of the torque limiter to 30mm3 who is appointed as a limiter iq.
Write permission
Quote
