Citazione Originally Written by SandroMarciano Visualizza Messaggio
The axis ? in the case that you adapt, otherwise you will not get modulabilit?.

the maps to me are:

*1E2330
*1E2424
*1E2518
*1E260C
*1E2700
*1E2800
*1E29C0
*1E2AC0

Then as you said yourself, the council ? working on the P factor with changes to read as an intervention, even modest often leads to an increase of the peak important.
Hello Sandro, I would like to return to the topic of the PID controller. Then I figured out the order of how they are and which ones are useful and which not. The problem main ? that between my file and the one of a 16v there are huge differences. In my files are almost straight lines while on the 16v are curves.. What should I do then? Why? I think that if you ever copiassi those of the 16v should I also copy some bits just before relating to the pid. For? does not convince me as a thing. Now I was able to keep enough pressure stable even helped me with the limiter pressure turbo that always, that if the down to the high, always giving 50mbar in pi? from the map the pressure is pi? stable. At 5000 rpm, I had come to open the geometry is less than 20% why? if no dated back pressure as I move away too much from the pms taking injection high, and having left advances scaled up to 4500. I would like to? try changing the PID to see if I can improve. Can you give me a hand? The factor D, which you had said to leave well 0 appears to be down? 0 from the original. Unless they are reversed in my file than the one immediately after that ? 'during transient operation'. Other for? they are almost all straight lines on my file ori. How do you think it would be best to proceed?