Let's say for example that car from 1995 to about 2006 would be fine for the 1260 ?
Of course, after some changes in the links in the case of cars that do not have the OBD type of the FIAT with the three pin plug...
Let's say for example that car from 1995 to about 2006 would be fine for the 1260 ?
Of course, after some changes in the links in the case of cars that do not have the OBD type of the FIAT with the three pin plug...
However, for that which costs 1260 worth it, however as you have already mentioned are tools of two different generations.
And when you speak of the ROOSTER 2 refers to the v54?
. ..gallen 2=wing nut 48 and the upper
What is the probability that a wingnut chinese face lock the ECU ? Depends on the hardware or the software that makes it work?
it is an answer that nobody can give you just need to be aware that a kess clone costs 100€, while a kess official $ 4400+tax, therefore, a difference there must be.Originally Written by Melo81
[IMG]http://bannerbreak*****/banners/3/563/135700419269659378.gif[/IMG]
I'm sorry, but I don't think a comprehensive answer...I do Not believe that on the original there are components lacquered in 18 carat gold, the management software was designed by NASA...
Exactly as written by someone if NOT the original is of good quality construction should not create problems... in my opinion it is more a software problem than hardware...
Anyway, thanks for the response, but the 4400 € + 22% of which are extremely excessive in my opinion...
I am sorry to tell you but if you think that way obviously you are not a professional and do not add more.
[IMG]http://bannerbreak*****/banners/3/563/135700419269659378.gif[/IMG]
the clones all in all if they are of the quality to be very good,the problem is that they are not updated then you can just make the old cars,not to you technical support in case of problems, etc...
Sorry but that response you were expecting more of what you had to say? A clone is a clone; not to comply with certain standards for construction of type quality, ISO, etc, etc; the components often varies, just open the two and make the comparison and it is not excluded that is assembled with components of scrap; if you read the forum you see the various changes replacement parts to who did it.
Then the manufacturer of the clone, does not make certain the test and only after that have it on hand see at least in the start-up works, not excluding that can make messes in the phase in which you are working on a unit.
It is true that by now the clones are more reliable, but nobody can ever say how much.
Hello
Write permission
Quote
