but! according to me are not understood! excuse my intrusionOriginally Written by blackwolf76
but! according to me are not understood! excuse my intrusion
has the error on the cks
while the others are still talking about us, we have already solved the problem
GARAGE0864 ԼЄƓЄƝƊƛƦƳƧԼƛVЄ
from what I understood, it seemed to me that she had tried with the other control unit, and could have excluded the problem with the ecu.
Yes the ecu ? been tried, but with negative results.
I don't know pi? what evidence do the error ? always:
the control unit 4242 cecksum within
A problem immo I would bring this defect, a maximum drive would not be starting
For curiosities?... have you tried to do a reading bdm, correction cks, and then rewrite??
I, as I told you, I'd try to work on the e2p that me ? seemed to understand ? remained the original, we try we try to make a partial directly on the outlet to the break-in could you post the two readings, I have in mind one thing
while the others are still talking about us, we have already solved the problem
GARAGE0864 ԼЄƓЄƝƊƛƦƳƧԼƛVЄ
another thing to try to make a diagnosis that instead of the error 4242 return to you the error pxxxx I would not like that you are wearing out the road
while the others are still talking about us, we have already solved the problem
GARAGE0864 ԼЄƓЄƝƊƛƦƳƧԼƛVЄ
if you read the first post you see that written all over it
so for now, I'm stuck why? the customer ? brought the car,so I can't do tests just brings me back to the car, I know the tests I did.
I am attaching the file that I read:
this and the one used
Last edited by msport (exil77grande); 06-06-2013 at 09:47
ok tonight you look at them
while the others are still talking about us, we have already solved the problem
GARAGE0864 ԼЄƓЄƝƊƛƦƳƧԼƛVЄ
Write permission
Quote