maybe even a little extreme, given the quantity? of increase you have to understand what is guaranteed and the reliability of the stressed parts ... but in fact if you have done the right things what is there still to change?
maybe even a little extreme, given the quantity? of increase you have to understand what is guaranteed and the reliability of the stressed parts ... but in fact if you have done the right things what is there still to change?
The car is fine. consumes a bit in the city? . I ask for help why? according to a couple of mappers ? been made without logic. Confirm that the increases should not be the same from 500 to 5000 rpm ?
I confirm the map does not really appropriate I don't like the times I don't like the turbo I absolutely love it, the rail then you fap active because starting with increments so down absolutely to reviewOriginally Written by lion.79
while the others are still talking about us, we have already solved the problem
GARAGE0864 ԼЄƓЄƝƊƛƦƳƧԼƛVЄ
Then it would be appropriate to bring back up to 1500 rpm values to the standard ones ? I would lose in performance. ?
Write permission
Quote