You exact. Not necessary to modify the injection time up to when you are in the range of the original which is usually ? of 80mm3. The quantity? injected, gets out of the Driver's wish and limiters various, and at that point the ecu is the user? a single injection times longer to deliver the deal? request.Originally Written by max75
let's say that the way most convenient for a matter of time' before to fool the ecu without doing many calculations ? the reasoning...the second ? that is a bit more processed, but you get great results....each his choice.
Therefore, the injection timing of the original are fine as long as the quantity? injected (premium) does not exceed the maximum value of the axis of the map of the times?
the discourse ? that if we take a greater amount of fuel we need to see if there are the right times...vice versa if we have a longer...
For the right times you mean to say not to prolong the injection too over the top so as to avoid waste of fuel and consequent fumosit
exact....
Excellent, thanks for the confirmation!
I make another account, since the map of the injection timing "this act"? correct to say that the actual pressure at which the diesel fuel is injected ? defined from the time of injection and the quantity? injected, and then the map rail pressure only indicates the limit values?
if you want to inject a certain amount? of fuel without times increase the risk of having an increase in temperatures....to make that this does not happen, you can increase the rail pressure...
If you increase the amount? injected also leaving the original times these will stretch from you to be able to precisely inject what to ask. Of course, this happens up to the maximum reference that we have on the break point of the iq in the map times. On the 1.3 mjet for example, the injection times are calculated up to 65mm3 and 1800 bar? from the original injected 42mm3 about at the bottom, to go down to 35 to 40 to 4000 rpm. Raise the time you may have results that are truly amazing. On a 1.9 mjet the highest iq ? 65-70mm3 about in low-and 60-65mm3 to 4000 rpm, for? the times are already? calculated for 80mm3 then, also, you may have good results without touching the times why? injecting 80mm3 to 4000 rpm are already? almost 20mm3 in pi? from the original and can you imagine the cv are already? out of several if it is given the right advance.
If I play well, seen that increasing the pressure allows me to reduce the duration of the injection, this means that, in general, the temperature increase ? caused by the repeated delays in the injection too over the top?
Write permission
Quote