Results 1 to 5 of 5

View Hybrid

  1. #1
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Feb 2014
    Messages
    128

    The difference in the map display between ECM and WinOLS

    Whereas, the use WinOLS as the editor, for educational purposes I open the same file the original with Winols that with the ECM (which I know very little).

    I opened one of the maps proposed by the ECM ('Rail Pressure') and I on the Y-axis (values from 250 to 4500) rpm and on the X-axis numbers ranging from 6 to 100, which would make me think of a percentage, so for example the driver's wish. With WinOLS and then I go to the same address map (E2A8C) that, once opened, gives me the same Y-axis (engine rpm) but on the X-axis values ranging from 500 to 7000 which with correction factor of 0.01 (so from 5 to 70) would make me think of the deal? of diesel fuel.

    Because the X-axes do not coincide in the two software? ? as a matter of settings of the ECM or am I doing something wrong?

  2. #2
    THE ACTIVE USER L'avatar di Backgroop
    Date Of Registration
    Feb 2013
    The resort
    Oppido Mamertina
    Et
    39
    Messages
    1,146
    If the ecm to trust you with you driver's most of the times are wrong, first of all open the maps on both the ecm and winols without the use of damos or driver's choose the value to display if an 8-or 16-bit and compared direttamenteb the real values in hex or decimal, and see if c'? difference if it's the same file difference nothing
    The patience and virtue of the strong..

  3. #3
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Feb 2014
    Messages
    128
    Ok clear, so the difference on the axis ? due to the interpretation of the driver.
    The content of the map, at least in this case ? identical, mbar with a scale factor of 0.1 and a maximum value equal to 1400.
    Then looking at it in winols ? correct to assume that to the map ? rail pressure with axes rpm / quantity? injected ?

  4. #4
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Feb 2013
    The resort
    Arezzo - Florence
    Messages
    961
    Citazione Originally Written by everyname Visualizza Messaggio
    Ok clear, so the difference on the axis ? due to the interpretation of the driver.
    The content of the map, at least in this case ? identical, mbar with a scale factor of 0.1 and a maximum value equal to 1400.
    Then looking at it in winols ? correct to assume that to the map ? rail pressure with axes rpm / quantity? injected ?
    yes, I confirm, the beauty of winols ? that makes the law, the axes that are in the map, ecm, instead, you d? values that someone has entered with the drivers, so not sure exact!

  5. #5
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Feb 2014
    Messages
    128
    Citazione Originally Written by SandroMarciano Visualizza Messaggio
    yes, I confirm, the beauty of winols ? that makes the law, the axes that are in the map, ecm, instead, you d? values that someone has entered with the drivers, so not sure exact!
    In fact, this file I find 0-100 on all axes! Thanks Sandro, you have been very clear.
    WinOLS instead, it acknowledges a hundred maps of potential but not alcna indication on the type of map, sin, some, it seems to me that there are even maps..

Write permission

  • You you can not post new threads
  • You you can not send answers
  • You you can not send attachments
  • You you can not edit your posts
  •