Map Alfa 147 1.9 JTDm 120 hp

[tidus1985]

Riecomi after a small period of absence, next Saturday I'm going to mount the clutch and flywheel of the coupe turbo 20v so as to increase the torque at low speeds, are now limitatom by the flywheel the original, erogo 110mm3 of diesel oil after 2500 rpm, and the turbine is up to 1.6 bar 2000 rpm 1700bar 2500 rpm 1.8 bar, 3000 rpm 1.7 bar 4000 rpm, but from behind I can still see a bit of smoke, I'm with advances close to 4.5 degrees maximum time inj for 110mm3 and rail up to 1700 bar but I do not know if ? too much diesel for the gt2256v, I don't think so anyway

[Blackhawk]

Riecomi after a small period of absence, next Saturday I'm going to mount the clutch and flywheel of the coupe turbo 20v so as to increase the torque at low speeds, are now limitatom by the flywheel the original, erogo 110mm3 of diesel oil after 2500 rpm, and the turbine is up to 1.6 bar 2000 rpm 1700bar 2500 rpm 1.8 bar, 3000 rpm 1.7 bar 4000 rpm, but from behind I can still see a bit of smoke, I'm with advances close to 4.5 degrees maximum time inj for 110mm3 and rail up to 1700 bar but I do not know if ? too much diesel for the gt2256v, I don't think so anyway

tidus, you've mounted the 2256v?

[jovandj]

see the volume of air that you pump the crowd and calculates a ****s stechio as you're put

[tidus1985]

you already hadn't done the calculation are on the 17/18 of afr, with the last map I did not log.

now from the map around with 105mm3 of diesel rebuilt right pora, I had to get to 4.5? of advance to get the degrees tdc decent, here is the table of dogve get the inj to 105mm3 after tdc, rporta 100 because I want to 100mm3 from the map the maximum value for not going to move the other limiters in the most so I make first

place the current map, I rescaled maps pedal to get more risolyuzione I have brought max to 5200 rpm, plus I don't need

for now, the pids are ori turbine responds well, then I have not retouched, maybe it has a slight delay in spool but not ? what problem

[jovandj]

17 18 afr you are very good

[artone]

appearance of being a user and not so young to open attachments cistus to learn usero own a 147 jtd.....

[leandro89]

appearance of being a user and not so young to open attachments cistus to learn usero own a 147 jtd.....

your response to the post is not ? constructive ? an attempt in vain to reach the threshold of 80 messages
we all

[tidus1985]

it is mounted about a month ago and 3 weeks ago I mounted the flywheel and clutch coupe
now okay, peaks of 1.9 bar and stable 17/1 .8 bar

[Blackhawk]

why? you've mounted a turbine of the old generation? when they are available turbines much more? recent
then the 2256 ? even more? fragile the 1749va or vb ? the mountains of the series. it only has ir? range but ? pi? delicate why? built with less valuable materials.
Hai mounted on the collectors of the series I guess

[tidus1985]

Then, if you are talking about va and VB already? you don't know these engines, since? va and VB are fitted on the injector pump of the vag group and on some of the rotary pump of the same group, the 115 and 120 hp montano, respectively, gt1749v and gt1749mv that differs from the first geometry was improved "multivane" as to the gt2256v that use ? of the same generation of gt1749vm and has the same strength, it varies from model to 175cv multijet only on the nut of the exhaust connection at the exhaust round instead of triangular, with screws but the core assy and the same. The same Barrett for their compressor 56mm bushings on a compressor map that exceeds 2.0 bar of boost, more than 25 lb/m intake, then pu? hold the 1.8/1.9 bar without problems if you do not claim the 5000 rpm, where the heat generated by the egt is likely to cause harm, in fact many make it out to that number of laps.
The turbine ? mounted on the necks of the original but changed the attack to not suffer deformations and seal trimetallica.
I'll give you reason on the fact that we have been able to mount a turbine as the gtb1756vk that but he had also recommended Munro or a gtb2056 derivation Brera 210cv, but I had to deal with my pockets and I opted for a choice that guarantees me anyway, a good cavalry in the order of 190/200 hp, of course I know I could not expect more than but enough for me and I advances given that the car ? for normal use, and must also and above all last longer than that give me some satisfaction every so often where it is allowed.