MARELLI MJET impariamola!

[munro]

I have not posted screen... however if you look at the maps in winols you realize that you do not have maps of the pedal, but the sw calls engine injection protection in F t cool....
and as a p? English I think I know it means protection injection engine as a function of engine temp(coolant)
then, and a torque limiter or a fuel injection diesel fuel, call it what you like as a function of engine temp.....
c'? also another limiter diesel-torque as a function of temp diesel....
the map of screen backgroop on the ecm of the Gp 75hp ? always map the pedal that I and Mario continiuamo to say that they are those of the screen posted by Mario....

[munro]

however, if you wish to remove doubts about what you call the maps pedal....just that in the axis where you think you see the percentage of pedal you convert the value in the axis 0,004 the conversion factor just to see the correct percentage and see what jumps out.....
if the accounts do not return... return to convert the same value to 0.5, and magically you will see the temperature in the axis....

[Backgroop]

Guys you must excuse Me but I correct myself, tonight by examining well the Damos I realized that I have the wrong map, the map the pedal and what you say, I am convinced why? uploading the file to a point 75hp on ecm gave me also maps diesel, I rimangio all that I said in the earlier posting the complete map and the conversion methods;

on the X-axis we have the turns as gi? said by you, displayed in real without applying conversions
on the y-axis we have the pedal Position % filtered with a conversion value of 0,004000
on the z-axis we have N*m ( cio? the couple that referred to the map TrqPropReqTOff ) conversion value 0,023438

the maps are the main and the similar as the knobs on the pedal are 2 (main and secondary)

[munro]

for me it's not ? nothing happened...quiet backgroop...the most important thing ? agree on the particolait? this ecu....
because gi? ? a p? tricky of his.....

[mariodarkblue]

hahahha okkk don't worry...luckily..the hell!!there I was losing the view
Anyway, why? there are those points in the negative? to "neutralize" the first % of the pedal at high speed?to favour the return to a minimum at high speed?

[Backgroop]

This is the map in question, as is represented in the damos:

mappPed.jpg

This and 3d:

mapPed3d.jpg

the values do not need to be read in contrast to the negative points, as it claims Munro serve to make a kind of cut-off in the release phase, I noticed that changing the drive remains slightly accelerated after a sgassata at full load

[mariodarkblue]

exactly...so..here is need to encourage the return to a minimum...but, so? for example, at 4500 rpm, not the avr? the request for the first couple of % of the pedal...

[munro]

very strange the fact that the maps pedal is not read to the contrary...
from the link sportknight, it is evident that both the torque limiters classic that the timing inj is read to the contrary...
therefore, logically speaking ? looking at the shape of the map from right to left, the shape is very similar to a DW of a edc16c......
to address the negative points...in the screen of the winols read: pedal position %(percentage) filtered/Nm...
I rest the idea that ? a correction in the map on its output....i.e. if, for example, the last break point ? 256nm(random numbers)
the ecu interpolates or better subtracts the negative value to a positive value for a correction....

[dvdtuning]

Murno you are right and I am confused why? it seemed to me your avatar...

[Backgroop]

exactly...so..here is need to encourage the return to a minimum...but, so? for example, at 4500 rpm, not the avr? the request for the first couple of % of the pedal...

Judging from the first appearance it seems that both cos?, but according to me comes into play well as the speed? of the car, in fact on the map says:
conversion method (Eng. Speed proc. - Copy of rpmf for TB task ,pedal Position % filtered)/ N*m