Page 3 of 3 PrimaBefore 123
Results 21 to 30 of 41

View Hybrid

  1. #1
    THE AVERAGE USER L'avatar di bart
    Date Of Registration
    Sep 2012
    Messages
    283
    Citazione Originally Written by jacktheripper2 Visualizza Messaggio
    I just checked the latest map,the required torque during the start-up,so meanwhile, I had forgotten to change the bp that are a p? different,then, strangely, the ecm such as 10x16 on the file of the 8v while the file ori of the chroma from him as 16x16. Now I try to put back the stock at this point
    I have regarded myself, and I noticed that the values of the two plans (8v and 16v)are different, so according to me you have two possibilities: the first ? try to put it back to original and see how it goes (as gi? proposed you too), alternatively, you need to take the map 16x16 and interpolarla on 10x16.


    Citazione Originally Written by jacktheripper2 Visualizza Messaggio
    ...1E2EC in fact it looks like a map 4x10. I got up, without looking good bp. The damos not the from but ? the third limiter of the vgt since only raising the other 2 before bed was pi? 75% while also raising this,even if I don't have very well understood what are the bp,the first may be atmospheric pressure and the second I just don't understand. Should I raise just the tips to 6144, according to you, leaving the part that goes down is the original? So in the end what matters to me ? to close the geometry more than 75% up to just before 2000 rpm.
    This plan remains a bit ambiguous: it would seem a 4x10, but also no...
    Similarly, BP leave me a bit puzzled!!! For? I seem a bit low to be barometric pressure...
    According to me, for a certainty, you should check through the Damos specific...
    "Drive sideways is one of the most beautiful activities that a man can do to dress" M. Biasion

  2. #2
    THE AVERAGE USER L'avatar di mikyrace82
    Date Of Registration
    Jun 2013
    Messages
    146
    Sandro what can I say...***** plimenti you are a great!I always follow your posts..

  3. #3
    THE AVERAGE USER L'avatar di nasone147
    Date Of Registration
    May 2013
    The resort
    avellino
    Et
    40
    Messages
    141
    Citazione Originally Written by mikyrace82 Visualizza Messaggio
    Sandro what can I say...***** plimenti you are a great!I always follow your posts..
    I love!!

  4. #4
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Feb 2013
    Messages
    216
    Citazione Originally Written by SandroMarciano Visualizza Messaggio
    from 1e2330 find 4 D, 4 I, other maps, various, and, finally, *1e29c0 2 P.
    The sensor aveo read or don't recall, from 3.5, however, the pu? go!
    Thanks a lot,I for pid controller I meant all others..
    Where I have indicated for? I have seen the first 6,and then 1e29c0 other 2.. How ever I have seen 2? I imagine that we have the BP similar to others and yet they do not see them. I have seen that some stop at 3750 rpm,the other at 4500 and the other at 5500. Now for? I wonder,given that the values that I have to tot laps are the same for all of the iq,I should first try to update only the last BP putting 120mm3? Or I could also scale it by removing 30 and 50mm3 and making it become 10-20-40-60-70-80-90-100-120. Even why? for the low iq I think that there are no more? of so much, and that my problem ? with iq high that there are no axes.

  5. #5
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Feb 2013
    The resort
    Arezzo - Florence
    Messages
    961
    Citazione Originally Written by jacktheripper2 Visualizza Messaggio
    Thanks a lot,I for pid controller I meant all others..
    Where I have indicated for? I have seen the first 6,and then 1e29c0 other 2.. How ever I have seen 2? I imagine that we have the BP similar to others and yet they do not see them. I have seen that some stop at 3750 rpm,the other at 4500 and the other at 5500. Now for? I wonder,given that the values that I have to tot laps are the same for all of the iq,I should first try to update only the last BP putting 120mm3? Or I could also scale it by removing 30 and 50mm3 and making it become 10-20-40-60-70-80-90-100-120. Even why? for the low iq I think that there are no more? of so much, and that my problem ? with iq high that there are no axes.
    The axis ? in the case that you adapt, otherwise you will not get modulabilit?.

    the maps to me are:

    *1E2330
    *1E2424
    *1E2518
    *1E260C
    *1E2700
    *1E2800
    *1E29C0
    *1E2AC0

    Then as you said yourself, the council ? working on the P factor with changes to read as an intervention, even modest often leads to an increase of the peak important.

  6. #6
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Feb 2013
    Messages
    216
    Citazione Originally Written by SandroMarciano Visualizza Messaggio
    The axis ? in the case that you adapt, otherwise you will not get modulabilit?.

    the maps to me are:

    *1E2330
    *1E2424
    *1E2518
    *1E260C
    *1E2700
    *1E2800
    *1E29C0
    *1E2AC0

    Then as you said yourself, the council ? working on the P factor with changes to read as an intervention, even modest often leads to an increase of the peak important.

    I have tried to update only the pid with the iq that injection for? ? little changed nothing.. Now, however, are in practice managed to solve log after log. I always have a pressure drop about 4000 rpm, 2.1 switch to 1.9 and 200 rpm back.. and them involved the pid why? the geometry goes from 26% to about 35%.. I tried to open it drastically, coming up to 12% on the last curve and cos? I followed the map vgt from the log for? I was 1.8 after the 4200.. a p? too little..
    Today I raised? I lifted too why? ? again spoke to the pid. Now I tried to lower a middle ground to see if it goes well.. Anyway, the car goes very well and I think I have about 260 hp.. And the beautiful thing ? that you do NOT smoke if you are not between 1500 and 2200 with everything already? (injects over 110mm3 gi? at 2200 rpm and load 2 bar) at 2300 rpm)..
    I'm using the injection times calculated differently and not as I was before. You Sandro uses the interpolation? Why? I read your comment where you said that applying the same % that davi at the BP. For? cos? are much more? long interpolation.. I tried to use this method, however, and I find myself a lot of times high, and to get the eoi 4/4,5 degrees at 4500 rpm I have 3.6 degrees in the pi? the file of the 1.9 150 hp and 4.5 degrees in the pi? ducati racing where the use of the injection times. I do not know that are a few degrees in the pi? (counting then that to mean I have even more?) for? with the times that are cos? long I could not do anything. Cos? com'? is 910 degrees to 250.. First times interpolated, which were much more? the courts and advance pi? close to the pms I had never reached 900 degrees..? now has a delivery full.. Here is an example...http://www.youtube*****/watch?v=AZHMe...FYBn3-2EnEAkwg. I hope I don't violate the rules by putting up the video, and precise ? was made in the German autobahn (I'm in holland for a year).. Counting that does not smoke anything into practice (from the inside I can't see anything) and runs at 2.2 a peak from 2500 up to 3500, then 2,1 up to 4000 where it has the drop to 1 .9 to 200 rpm and then it goes back to 2.05 up to the limiter as the map objective.
    However, the only way to be able to do not intervene in the pid ? open both the geometry at the top with high iq, and pr do you have to lower the limiters.

  7. #7
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Feb 2013
    Messages
    216
    Citazione Originally Written by SandroMarciano Visualizza Messaggio
    The axis ? in the case that you adapt, otherwise you will not get modulabilit?.

    the maps to me are:

    *1E2330
    *1E2424
    *1E2518
    *1E260C
    *1E2700
    *1E2800
    *1E29C0
    *1E2AC0

    Then as you said yourself, the council ? working on the P factor with changes to read as an intervention, even modest often leads to an increase of the peak important.
    Hello Sandro, I would like to return to the topic of the PID controller. Then I figured out the order of how they are and which ones are useful and which not. The problem main ? that between my file and the one of a 16v there are huge differences. In my files are almost straight lines while on the 16v are curves.. What should I do then? Why? I think that if you ever copiassi those of the 16v should I also copy some bits just before relating to the pid. For? does not convince me as a thing. Now I was able to keep enough pressure stable even helped me with the limiter pressure turbo that always, that if the down to the high, always giving 50mbar in pi? from the map the pressure is pi? stable. At 5000 rpm, I had come to open the geometry is less than 20% why? if no dated back pressure as I move away too much from the pms taking injection high, and having left advances scaled up to 4500. I would like to? try changing the PID to see if I can improve. Can you give me a hand? The factor D, which you had said to leave well 0 appears to be down? 0 from the original. Unless they are reversed in my file than the one immediately after that ? 'during transient operation'. Other for? they are almost all straight lines on my file ori. How do you think it would be best to proceed?

  8. #8
    THE ACTIVE USER L'avatar di munro
    Date Of Registration
    Oct 2012
    The resort
    EARTH
    Messages
    1,207
    I'd like to read these discussions to some trainer award-winning, only for the curiosity? to see that face they make...according to me a color(face)goes and another comes....ah ah ah...you guys are great 'c'? what can I say...simple enthusiasts who know much more than many of the alleged eternal parents are in charge with the smell under the nose...
    continue cos? that you are in the strong leg
    A rider does not create queues even in the car...
    a automoblista create queues even on a motorcycle...

Page 3 of 3 PrimaBefore 123

Write permission

  • You you can not post new threads
  • You you can not send answers
  • You you can not send attachments
  • You you can not edit your posts
  •