Hello rodcraft86,
excuse my curiosity? how come you're focused on the oils
PAO and hydrocracked? I ask you this question why? the use
prevalent of these firms ? oriented not on commercial vehicles, but bens?
on the industry, even if I've heard of them (especially in Spain they make wide use).
Palmi (I never had the opportunity to make comparisons with the oils of the usual calibre)
they represent a good solution for those who use heavy vehicles(speaking of engine oil) type:
Wheel loader, Bulldozers, etc.
Absolutely to be avoided, according to me, lubricants, "race" which in my opinion
there have even tried to develop decent one.
To return to the discussion of the specific GL, which of course are not very clear,
I wanted you to understand that the specification that is proposed is not ? dedicated specifically to the changes
but bens? for the gears (obviously, the exchange falls into this category) specification GL-5 is
not appropriate for those transmissions that take the synchronizers
this is because? the motion of the synchronizers ? different (non-hypoid) from the gearbox...you will say, but on race cars
put the "GL-5"...? true, but in the vast majority of the time the changes are not synchronized, or the
crown ? pi? small (the change is not synchronized ? pi? fast..."pi? ? synchronized", then pi? has the teeth on the selector,
pi? ? slow)
