No my intervention was not threatening towards you do not know you ? I'm not used to shoot on random people, if you re-read well the message c'? a at least that should explain everything. But maybe ? just my interpretation wrong...
today I made several log, but nothing unusual...
diesel, rail, map the pedal, turbo, egr(reverse), mass air temp...
only thing abnormal that the requested torque from the pedal, not salt limited by smoke limitation and torque restriction which I don't think ? managed by the map lim a pair (quato has higher values in the map). should I try to raise a bit more the map-injection correction to the address 1F90F8
I'm attaching the log
the butterfly pu? be that limits the torque? as was the case on some gasoline? also if for? the prex remains fixed to 2600 bar (1600)
The butterfly does not limit anything in your case, unfortunately I can't download alleggati but not ? that you have problems only adjustment limiters, maybe you missed something..
The last step is the rail pressure almost original, and according to me ? best of the old file, so the log does not exceed 1800 Bar in each case.
I don't know anything about edc17 but I think that the problem may be the limiter rail that has the last 2 curves cut, perhaps from the original do not get to touch those areas of the map and you don't have problems, try to bring them to the 1800's
franco, you say so?? (see attached file)
from the logs the rail pressure exceeded 1800 bar
RPM P. Rail
3933 1800
3933 1784
4002 1808
4048 1816
4117 1816
4186 1872
*leandro turbo pressure constant 1.6 while
instead, the output torque decreases, after the 3200 rpm limited by the parameter that diagnosis appointment, Torque restriction, while having the lim of the pair in the map with a much longer high (but this ? another speech)
But the problem you f? with all the steps that you posted the qu???? I, however, the time an overboost them I would have left the original since you're already? altino pressure. And two step you left out a torque limiter.