to be honest, the table I had never seen.. but on the advice of well-known "preparatory" I know that most of the people I know who use the car on the track using the 300v.. even on a motorcycle. I don't do extreme use and I never had any problems..? I do not deny that, according to me ? a p? too overrated.. c'? better short.. and at a much lower cost..
I remember some of the values, type infiammabilit? that should be the flash column of your table. Remember that the selenia wr came up to 230?, the bardahl xtc 60 more than 200? and also the shell was not really the value. I refer to the technical data sheets of the manufacturers that I have had the opportunity to see here is why? I was wondering as to the reliability? of your data...
Personally, the choice of the lubricant, I think that is a fundamental thing. My choices are based on the technical specifications that you can often find in the net; I consider the viscosity? kinematics at different temperatures, the values of HTHS, freezing point and infiammabilit?, pi? in general, I try many pi? information relating to the ASTM specifications of the products that interest me. In the past I tried to analyse some oils (by a friend of the Bs Lubricants) used by me by making a comparison between Motul X-Clean 5W30, Castrol EDGE 5W30 and Bardahl Technos C-60 Exceeded 5W30 all used on my 118D N47D20A for no more? of 6 thousand Km and approximately in the same conditions.
From the various analyses it turned out that the Bardahl was not the great oil that had told me, that the X-Clean instead ? an excellent product, while the Catrol stood in the middle with values very close to X-Clean in terms of capacity? keep it in suspension, preventing sludge collected and debris filings, diesel, Etc.Etc...
Made this great preamble, I highly recommend you consult the technical data sheets of the products that you'd like to try, and to understand something about the test, I refer you to this Link:
Very useful to interpret the various D2270, D445, D92 and D97, Etc.Etc... present in the data sheets of the products even more? commercial!
With regard to the use of additives of third parties, such as anti-friction, cleaners and others, I've always been very skeptical for several reasons: the lubricants are already? for example, if additized EP and the use of low-friction external, usually to a molecular solid such as PTFE, molybdenum disulfide, fullerene C60 (Bardahl this to a minimum, so the minimum does not make it relevant in the Testing phase IMHO) to saturate the capacity? dispersing the lubricant in a pi? short period of time, as well as reduce the capacity? polarization of the lubricant on the mechanical components. To create a cos? of the peaks of friction, in spite of a general reduction of the same on the complex of the mechanical parts, that can affect the integrity? of the film of lubricant. As far as the cleaners, the speech ? very simple, I have had various negative experiences: seals, ruined, separation of sludge so large as to clog the dip tube in the cup, contamination of the lubricant again.
I'm attaching a couple of PDF's that for me have been "lights", here are the games my many searches.
I want to clarify, since you are in the subject, which, from what I could understand with some research done, the point of infiammabilit? ? a value that is as much about pi? the security tab that the technical and beyond certain values (190?C) ? considered to be residual as a specification.
if you want to learn everything and more about lubricants and their characteristics, see here:
I recommend you read it all...then we'll talk if you v? what ? a good oil....
I know that Thread and I studied a lot even on the tables that you find in the Forum Process, to?, in my opinion, to have a good culture on the top ? this:
v. v can I ask you for an opinion on a lubricant used me? ? the royal purple 0w40 admixed with the rx-10 an additive to the base length, what do you say? thanks
!
Write permission
