Opinion the map Alfa Gt MJET

[GPoint]

I have not seen the map, but x ratings ? better wait for someone more? expert.

If you happen to give her a look and say to me if that was what you intended to map informed? The two lim iq are modified correctly?

In a previous post I have answered on the question on the map deceived and lamba saying that there is no need to change it, but if, on the request of the pedal, I ask x nm and this x I corresponds to a value in the mm3 pi? the top of the one in the map fumosit? not me is limited anyway? Cos? doing this will not get an increase of mm3 perch? I have increased the times but not on the basis of the value in mm3 that I think but on the basis of the value limited by the map of lambda?

[panterargento]

I've read the discussions recommended, I hope to have them designed just to understand the logic to inform the map. I tried to make some changes, but not being very sure of the work I don't know if a map like this I could try it or would be deleterious. My intent ? to get to about 85mm3 and see how it behaves with the machine both in performance and consumption, but as I said they are not able to assess the quality? (also to the reliability? in the time-frame of these changes having very little experience.

There are still things that are not in the limiters iq out of the drivers...the time you have figured out how to inform them only, that should be arranged hammer, for informalra of all missing several BP as advances, vgt, rail and turbo (follow the principle of the times), I would have placed better on the foot pedal (I did not increase in the percentage) and the turbo, rail pressure I leave it gold, again ? an opinion of one that st? learning...


Annex 6741

If you happen to give her a look and say to me if that was what you intended to map informed? The two lim iq are modified correctly?

In a previous post I have answered on the question on the map deceived and lamba saying that there is no need to change it, but if, on the request of the pedal, I ask x nm and this x I corresponds to a value in the mm3 pi? the top of the one in the map fumosit? not me is limited anyway? Cos? doing this will not get an increase of mm3 perch? I have increased the times but not on the basis of the value in mm3 that I think but on the basis of the value limited by the map of lambda?

Just as you say, but if you increase the time without informing them I think that the lambda to be false...
However, I hope in an intervention of someone more? expert.

[panterargento]

I've read the discussions recommended, I hope to have them designed just to understand the logic to inform the map. I tried to make some changes, but not being very sure of the work I don't know if a map like this I could try it or would be deleterious. My intent ? to get to about 85mm3 and see how it behaves with the machine both in performance and consumption, but as I said they are not able to assess the quality? (also to the reliability? in the time-frame of these changes having very little experience.

Annex 6741

There are still things that are not in the limiters iq out of the drivers...the time you have figured out how to inform them only, that should be arranged hammer, for informalra of all missing several BP as advances, vgt, rail and turbo (follow the principle of the times), I would have placed better on the foot pedal (I did not increase in the percentage) and the turbo, rail pressure I leave it gold, again ? an opinion of one that st? learning...

[GPoint]

According to you, are the limits on iq raised that way does not go well? In various discussions, they say they pull a straight line, it was what you intended? I thought that to raise them following the pattern of the original was less invasive. For the time following the discussion of tidus and reading the tables that has kindly posted, I set up the bp times for 50 70 90 by changing the values only from 1000 bar up, this why? reading some of the information you spoke that the common rail pumps already? from 1500rpm provide 1000 bar, then given that the changes I made start at around that value I followed this logic. I don't know if they are the conclusions correct.

But I can inform simply map the times, and the other ingannarle? Just why? informing the map times, it seems to me the most? precise compared to the increase of the values in the table.

I should try the map and do a log to see what values I returns, just to get an idea. For? to be honest, are not 100% convinced

[panterargento]

The limit of iq increases in the peaks where ? the maximum capacity, you may as well try it cos? and make a log, however X inject ir? of 80mm3 you moddare other limiters, then in the case inject + 80 you should give a bit of advance, I can say that with 80mm3 machine v? discreetly and you don't even need to touch the times, you do one thing as soon as you download the map that I posted and try to do it the same maybe starting with the increases to 1500 rpm, watch out for? that ? defappata and not to be confused with the mod of the fap with the other.

[GPoint]

The limit of iq increases in the peaks where ? the maximum capacity, you may as well try it cos? and make a log, however X inject ir? of 80mm3 you moddare other limiters, then in the case inject + 80 you should give a bit of advance, I can say that with 80mm3 machine v? discreetly and you don't even need to touch the times, you do one thing as soon as you download the map that I posted and try to do it the same maybe starting with the increases to 1500 rpm, watch out for? that ? defappata and not to be confused with the mod of the fap with the other.

Ok, among other things, my even has the fap. To go a second OT, but for defappare you have changed the single bit which is discussed in "edc16 Impariamola" or did you use a specific software? At least you have tried to see how well does the machine with the mod of the single-bit luca stanca? The end OT

The other limiters iq if I'm not mistaken, you spoke of the other two are gi? values higher than 100, I don't know if you were talking to those or to others. For the question advances, it seems to me to have understood that something soft would be to vary about 1 degree, for? to be sincere ? one thing that I have not even looked at, I would like to first find some discussion of the pi? specific.

[panterargento]

Yes, I used "Time" for defappare, and not ? a single bit, but some areas I correct manually.

The other limiters, there is one at 100 one at 110 and one at 83...on advances ? quite complicated, and I st? trying to figure out.

[GPoint]

Yes, I used "Time" for defappare, and not ? a single bit, but some areas I correct manually.

The other limiters, there is one at 100 one at 110 and one at 83...on advances ? quite complicated, and I st? trying to figure out.

I miss the one at 83, I found the 2 to 77, which as you may have seen I had already? increased and the other 2 at 100 and 110 that I left the original.

Prover? to do some log from the original, to see how it behaves with the changes.

I also wanted to try to make a mod about 80mm3 as I've suggested, so you can leave the originals both times made out in that deal? fuel inj. Just to see how it behaves with only these changes. Virtually by modifying the pedal to get to that threshold inj and the various limiters including the lambda, maybe? I can also get an idea to practice.

[panterargento]

Read the post #27 here and watch the screen http://www.professionalchiptuning.ne...59-150cv/page3
The limiter 83 is located before the 110 and it looks like the torque limiter.

[panterargento]

The one on the 83 take it to 85 per team if you want to inject 80 (for me they are good), then if you want more? of course, you have to climb...