But what are the values of advance optimal for proper combustion? C'? a report\rule to maintain on the basis of how much salt to the qi and the rpm? The calculation of the times ? very useful, thank you.
sorry jovandj I'm slamming even I, with various calculations....a question time in the us does not need to convert them to x 0.976 for the duration of angular for real? And then the only thing I miss to interpolate all the data ? know relate to the Prail with the times, to know the q.t? delivered by the injector. The Cio? in parit? pressure and at different times the amount? change, but also with the times the same, but prail different changes. I don't know if I was clear...thanks
I've always calculated in the above manner other ways you do not know them, but I'm willing to discuss
The power is nothing without control
Oh god, are with the cell then no I have the address to hand, but the area 1e3220 about I go to memory there are 8 maps in a row and then 2 others are derivative control, proportional control and an integral end if I'm not mistaken....to answer the above, obviously, raising the p-rail, lower the angular duration of the injections, but not the amount? the moddi with tinj
The power is nothing without control
The angular duration of the injections are related to the rpm and to the time of inj. The Cio? at 4000 rpm I 0.024 ? to the Us. in the map time injection I time related to the prail and not to the laps. If injection for 900 US at 4000 rpm, the duration of injection ? 21.6 ?. But 21.6 ? if the prail ? 1000 q.t? ? X if, instead, the prail ? 1400 q.t? ? X1....oh god, I'm smoking, I don't car...
Yes, but the time shall be lower check the map times more salt p rail and short l inj in parit? fuel
The power is nothing without control