then the mod was supposed to be this
then the mod was supposed to be this
Last edited by msport (exil77grande); 23-11-2013 at 09:32
no one else has taken a look at what I've done?
I am attaching a file that I have prepared with regard to the injection time and I would like to understand if once you have defined the formula Tinj=(IQ*(K)/√Prail** and the constant K= (√Prail * Tinj)/ IQ-the calculation of the new time of injection ? right or not...
Last edited by msport (exil77grande); 27-11-2013 at 21:44
guys no one has given me an opinion on this file that I have attached with respect to the time of injection.....
if someone knows and wants to give him a look?
Sorry I will give you a summary of what I understand about the BP and did it myself on my map (we are talking about 147 140cv edc16c8) . The limiters iq as a function of temp and conditions of the car clearly have been lifted to 80mm3 (my goal). Then I tried all the maps that they brought on an axis q.t? diesel (prex turbo was a 70 as the prex of the rail and the 5 maps-injection phase) and I raised on the second curve that shows the horizontal axis and the last 2 values from 60 to 70 and from 70 to 80. In the table, so I copied the values of the last column to the 70's in one of the 60. Theoretically the map tinj and time should not be touched why? gi? calculated for the 80 mm3. The procedure here ? exact? Thanks
Let's say you need to see if from the diagnosis inject them
The power is nothing without control
Ok what ? obvious without the response of the diagnosis, you can't make calculations. What for? logic suggests to me ? that, in theory, on the last column, where we informed the ecu of the new limit 80mm3 you should also adjust the values of the Z-axis to the request of 80 instead of leaving them the same as they were for the value of 70. For example, the degrees of advance should be calculated for 80mm3 according to the time calculated for that value. Right?
The advances must be recalculated for the rest if you encounter problems, you can leave it also climbed to 70
hello to all
after reading this discussion, I finally understood what are the bp, but I have a couple of doubts about the orientation of the axes
looking at a map in 2d, the vertical axis (the cio? where it is possible to read actual values of the map) ? the z-axis
considering a single curve of a mapping, we'll have another axis (horizontal in 2d), and this corresponds to a single point on the third axis (say, perpendicular to the screen)
logic would say that the horizontal ? the x and scrolling through the various curves I increase the y right?
Belin that bother you and it is the third time that I all.....Then talking about BP....in the map call from the ecm injection times of my 147 mj 16 V edc16c8 hop in the axis rail pressure of the BP from 400 to 1400 bar 200 bar of scissors from one to the other and from 1500 to 1600 seven BP wasted (1594,1595.....1600), since I want to keep to a max of 1500 what happens if riscalo the axis up to 1500 max using those BP unused to divide the values of Prail? Of course, when the times right.... According to my theory ORI we have the same tinj from 1000 to 1199 and then if I give values more close-I injections more accurate. Has anyone tried that already a MOD like that? I hope I explained well....
Conceptually what you are saying ? correct, but I believe that between 1000 and 1199 is an interpolation
Quote
