First advice do not listen to those who promise the stables exorbitant! Without the mechanical changes you can reach max at 160 horses about, I have your same engine, only to? on the 147, as soon as I have the chance? looking at the new map will help!Originally Written by johnny
You said the magic word...
60 hp without touching the injection times, finally someone who can help johnny.
In fact, 60 hp seemed to many even for me, who am not an expert, I think you can get a thirty horse power with a good map without changes in the mechanical safety. I think that my map actual pu? give me a 15 horsepower, but with a provision that is not well distributed yet. Appearance your advice before changing the map again.
here I am..then from what I have learned,on a map and soft,I can tell you,in short....the torque limiter I usually increase of 15% while you're at the party by 10% up to a max of 25%..maps pedal 5%, and you're the same as well..the egr off ok..limiters rail you have given 3% I would have dared, and up to 5% for? starting from 1e6d68 and not as you did from 1e6d38!(because????)
You can believe as not to believe me is not nothing. I was on my own with the 1.9 16v, I rolled 262 hp and 540nm, with a maximum of 40% of time and 50% of the time I made 267 hp and 550nm, of course, with the turbine, exhaust, etc etc, I have the injectors in the 2.4 210 hp, but the % that I said ? based on these injectors, in comparison to my stock I have a little less than 30% with the map of 262 hp. I had a 147 1.9 16v 150 hp with only the map (no mechanical change) I could hardly keep up with him in the mix with an a6 3.0 245 hp. And the injection times are at about 10%.
Johnny now I have a look at your map, however, and let you know.
Edit, I still can't download the attachments I had forgotten. When can? do you give? a hand willingly.
Last edited by msport (exil77grande); 25-10-2013 at 00:36
in the first post there are the numbers, hw and sw ,I don't think it is difficult for you to find a file and let us see a change, and so to help johnny
Here is a file, as should be done. Don't look at the changes in grid why? the maps are scaled. Cos? as I made it you have rail pressure, turbo pressure, the advance and injection times the original up to when you're not around already. To make it ir? reactive, however, I ask for more? diesel fuel from the map the pedal and not just the lambda. The map 'deal? fuel injected' ? your up to 350nm and after ? the 16v has calibrated up to 500nm.
I made a regalone why? a map cos? not done in 2 minutes why? there are enough calculations behind, especially to calculate the lambda is that ? there? that limits the diesel in this file. Up to a p? fumer? I guess, for? should do nice cv.
I would just like to let you know that a friend of mine, we made a delta 1.9 twin turbo that with a map and exhaust has made 260 hp rolled on the tour slowed down, people didn't believe in it but the rolled ? that, and ? was taken on a tour curbed of people who did not know. The 1.9 190 hp has cams better fuel pump better injectors, better pistons, better, and being twin turbo has the turbine big ? big enough and turn to the 1.8 already? from the original, with 2 bars fixed have come out of those cv's.
Last edited by msport (exil77grande); 25-10-2013 at 00:37
my sarcasm was dictated by your output of 180 hp without touching either of the times, and given that we are not here to make those who have the longer I have asked to help you, and if you have rolled all of those hp blessed are you, I hope that the map you posted can help you.
p.s. how many hp would have this.
Should be about 180 hp. The diesel pu? give very well from the map the pedal. If the original injected 53mm3 to 4000 rpm and makes 120 hp, why? with 80mm3 to 4000 rpm could not get out 180 hp? The times are gi? calculated for 80mm3 then why? should be changed?
Write permission
Quote