Opinion the map bmw e46

[magi1984]

ok then the egr ? excluded correctly
for your map, if you want to know my opinion, I also don't like a p?, this is because? you gave all the maps a fixed proportion of the increase, while it would be better to go to scale, and then you've given increments exaggerated

to make you understand there? I mean, time of injection, you have given 126punti constants from 1000giri, and 40% of load up to 100%
it would be better to go from 60 to 120 points, using the INTERPOLATION function in order to give incremental
basically you've used this technique in all of the maps, for some it goes well, type the pressure of the rail where you have given an increase of 243 points constant, which for the record are 24bar in pi?, but for other maps it's not okay to work cos?
also for the turbo pressure you can give equal increments as you did, but 72 ? too little, by at least 150 points

the limiters are the known pi? sore of all your map, 2000 points, constant increment on all... in some maps you have given increments in the limiters equal to 100%, the turbo pressure you limited to 4400, the cio? 4.4 bar pressure that your turbine does not reach? never, break first.
the limiter rail pressure value is 18000, the cio? 1800bar, the edc17 work to 1800bar, not edc16

in addition, certainly for the error you gave an increase of 756% to the address e6b36
and you have not changed the maps of enrichment and acceleration, which are the maps that control everything.
you begin to change the maps and then adjust all the other

? as if you had started to build a house starting from the roof instead of the foundations

[blushark]

I did not understand well the method of interpolation,the cio? I have to start from 60 in the vertical until you get to 120?

[magi1984]

select the area that you want to edit in the map mode? table, then press the right button of the mouse and you will open the interpolation function

[blushark]

But for the rows or columns? I'm doing the changes you told me but for the injection split as I do,then for the enrichment in acceleration from what I understand, trying in telling me ? only a map that goes to vary the sensitivity? the sensor for the pedal and will come from? the injected ir? diesel in parit? pedal crushed, and therefore pi? Power

[magi1984]

I modify it for rows, but it's not up to me to tell you how to edit, not c'? a written law, everyone does it in his own way.

to map the throttle pedal ? the map that deals with the request of diesel fuel based on engine speed and the position padale
in practice, if the with the original map and the pedal at full load have a value of 100, the other maps are calibrated to give you the value that you have asked, what? 100
if you leave the original map and change only the other, ? as if with the pedal at full load have a value of 100, and the other maps are calibrated to give you 120
it makes no sense, why? 100 would be used, and the remaining 20 dispersed

[blushark]

In this map, I wouldn't know how to intervene,how many points do I have to give, and at what load and rpm?

[blushark]

If you continue to thank you for the attention that you're giving me the topic

[magi1984]

? a good habit to intervene in all of the maps from 1500rpm, 50% load
for me you can give increases ranging from 10% to 15%
using interpolation, put a check on percentage, for certain maps ? emglio working in percentage rather than in absolute

[blushark]

then the magi, after your valuable advice, I changed the map back,I tried it and let's say that I have remained without words for the power delivered and the only thing that I have not yet modified ? the map will. in acceleration,I would like to know the things you think about now and what should I still change.

[blushark]

in the pi? with the method of the interpolation I rimodificato a fiat bravo 1.9 120cv to a friend of mine and now it flies,leaving the absolute values of constants for all the maps except for that time in place where I used interpolation for lines