Then I place 2 screen 2 lim iq of edc16c8 147 mj 140cv. Some good guy can? tell me if I've modified in the right way?
Thanks
Screen lim IQ fT.jpg
Screen lim IQ F(%).jpg
Then I place 2 screen 2 lim iq of edc16c8 147 mj 140cv. Some good guy can? tell me if I've modified in the right way?
Thanks
Screen lim IQ fT.jpg
Screen lim IQ F(%).jpg
I can see the files, however, you have to change the tips on the edc16c8, guys just after the map the pedal, there is a map 0e1744 if I'm not mistaken on the edc16c8 that has I think speed? or rail on the first axis and or the pedal I think on the second axis on both the damos is c8 39 is not mentioned, do you know what indicates??
The power is nothing without control
small correction on the 39 and 1c1f86 while on c8 and 0e1744 both located just after the DW standard, both identical in many other ecu, however, are identical, the map 8x12 on an axis values from 8000 to 18000 (I think speed vehicle or rail, but I don't think) on the other hand, there should be the foot pedal but also the other might be, do you have any idea what this could indicate??
The power is nothing without control
*erre5 go well,
*jovandj that of which you speak ? a map is not used, the axis ? speed?, and from what I understood ? a calibration curve for the automatic transmission.
Oh hello Sandrone well-found, I'm not sure that it is not being used, and if the second axis were the conditions the vehicle??? The famous 8192 IQ limiter...while 1de302 should be the loop of minimum
The power is nothing without control
I was going to ask me! we want to talk about that a p? also edc16 vag?Originally Written by munro
I take unprepared pero I think the logic is the same I think
The power is nothing without control
absolutely no instead... ? completely different! even why? these engines have fuel injection systems "injector" and not the common rail...
look for someone that I can explain how to recognize between the various map that ECM calls "injection, split," what? the map and pedal map advances, map, duration, etc, etc... why? cos? with these names, all the same do not understand anything!I would like to understand the logic...
I thank anyone wants me to give a hand
first of all, to recognize them you should see by the BP values and must be converted on the basis of that then you fail to understand in the Z-axis things c'? indicated, and then the data drive to the hand to understand if? rail pressure, injection time,degrees advance, etc, etc....it takes a bit of experience and much study....anyway, here in the forum guidelines there are many...
the logic ? exactly the usual that for the c39 or c8, the only thing different are the duration, expressed in degrees instead of the injection times. as you said ducati83 if you look at the axis you recognize them right the first time, in x you have the spins in the y IQ diesel fuel, in z degrees of injection, which are obtained as the advances with the conversion factor 0,023438.absolutely no instead... ? completely different! even why? these engines have fuel injection systems "injector" and not the common rail...
look for someone that I can explain how to recognize between the various map that ECM calls "injection, split," what? the map and pedal map advances, map, duration, etc, etc... why? cos? with these names, all the same do not understand anything!
I thank anyone wants me to give a hand
*jovandj, go quiet do the tests that you want, doesn't change anything, and that they are inactive you can see that by the fact that in the damos are not reported, or if the comparisons with those of a 1.4 hdi (which has nothing to do with the 1.9 fiat) you see that they are identical.
Write permission
Quote
