and don't you emptied the turbine?
and don't you emptied the turbine?
the 75hp has fixed geometry the 90hp variable.
[IMG]http://bannerbreak*****/banners/3/563/135700419269659378.gif[/IMG]
changes made...
it goes bad in fact it was an overnight fixed that annoying blank below 2000, the only problem ? that with the long gears in acceleration over 3000 rpm, I salt the press in addition to 1.3 bar and I would like fixed, now we have installed a new polmoncino, but we still need to calibrate it...
in conclusion, I can say that this solution ? powerful and the machine ? become really enjoyable to drive
I would recommend it to anyone who wants a better yield of the engine at low revs and for those who want to have a response from the pi? rapid acceleration
But then you have mounted the turbine 90, i.e. the BV35 with the WG of 75, i.e. KP35?
I would like to take it further....A beautiful 1749 would be the top, but would surely lag down...With theoretically good results? to the high...
*extreme83...let's not go into offtopic...in the other section I have explained the mod and the results achieved...
*danny...I have seen mounted to a gt1749 under the ypsilon 1.3 mjet 70cv...2.5 bar has rolled 136cv...
*igor if the high tends to rise over the constant 1.3 you will have to loosen the p? the wg...
I seem to be a few horses to those pressures....
Mario, where are you?
*Danny...I am from Naples...performance, I believe, are scarce...xk? the map....ehm...makes you vomit...
I tried to loosen the wg, but in that case I miss the quickness to low that she wanted to the customer
as soon as I can calibrate the wg new, I know
on the 1.3mjet the best compromise power-lag and the turbine of the 1.6jtdm.
[IMG]http://bannerbreak*****/banners/3/563/135700419269659378.gif[/IMG]
But the code what?? In 1.6 not ? managed electronically variable geometry?
Write permission
Quote