Rimapatture...but how many times???????

[msport (exil77grande)]

ah here it is, delete the number of the scriptures! You are right!

for a moment you made me come to doubt hehehe.

[abberello]

Second, there are limits, otherwise someone would have already? exposed the problems!

[zioweb]

I think they are something stupid, unless there is a software limit... that bdm you should work around, or better yet, it can be seen from the memory and programming it with the programmer do it anyway.

the only limit to my opinion ? the same memory, which has a cycle of reading/writing well-defined by the manufacturer, beyond which "dies".

[V.V.]

Are not well defined, are approximate. I have a unit? Flash-Memory that has as its MTBF 10,000 hours and 10,000 cycles between writings and rewritings: my Rack record more than 36,000 hours (almost 5 years ? always on with occasional reboots). Considering the use that I make (compilation) already? after the first year and a half of life, I had almost certainly exceeded the number of cycles between the scriptures and rewrites. All this to say, that ? very likely that the maximum number of records is determined on the basis of other parameters than those merely of the structural component, i.e., on the basis of commercial requirements and to avoid problems on the part of consumers for the possible non-compliance with the stated specifications.

[zioweb]

Are not well defined, are approximate. I have a unit? Flash-Memory that has as its MTBF 10,000 hours and 10,000 cycles between writings and rewritings: my Rack record more than 36,000 hours (almost 5 years ? always on with occasional reboots). Considering the use that I make (compilation) already? after the first year and a half of life, I had almost certainly exceeded the number of cycles between the scriptures and rewrites. All this to say, that ? very likely that the maximum number of records is determined on the basis of other parameters than those merely of the structural component, i.e., on the basis of commercial requirements and to avoid problems on the part of consumers for the possible non-compliance with the stated specifications.

I love...

maybe my message could be misunderstood: I did not mean to say that it exceeded the MTBF stated, the unit? die... but who ? in any case declared a tolerance and if we want to say that c'? a limit, albeit theoretical, and on the "average" of the unit? tested by the manufacturer, it may be just that and not the other

[V.V.]

Perfect, just a misunderstanding !

[Giacomo]

Usually we don't reach limit scriptures, x that always rewrite the file with write to 0, in order to pick up the counter you should read the mod is made from the ecu edit, and rewrite and salts portion 2.
in practice, in order to pick up the counter you should read each time the modified map from the ecu, make the changes you want and rewrite, so salt the counter of the scriptures. so that remain stored in the scriptures,
instead, we (or at least I personally) every time I write a mod I write always from the first fail changed, doesn't it ? every time I start to read the fil mod from the machine and work on that, but I always work on the first modified, and then the counter remains at 1 share.
I don't know if I was clear

[alfajtd]

wrong.... if you use kess does not increase... I also believe galletto eobd2 and magpro2
but if you use the others who do not have this system, the increase in the scriptures increases the same, even using the file mother.

[Giacomo]

from the tests I have done to me is so....then each one expresses his!