Guys...don't make the case to those two errors...in the map proved by tidus were already? solved...I have them to him the facts already? note...they were already? been fixedOriginally Written by SandroMarciano
Guys...don't make the case to those two errors...in the map proved by tidus were already? solved...I have them to him the facts already? note...they were already? been fixed
Also the advances are high and the pressure of the rail... Why change that way so radical?
Keep in mind that just because the flue gas and losing performance...
be the advance payments have been calculated taking into account 80 and 100mm3 to have an injection that lasts long after the pms as the injection of the original, you like avrsti amended advances and rail, then look carefully and you will notice that both advances that rail are rescaled up to 100mm3, while for the rail I increased up to 150bar more to 100mm3 the pressure to the midrange to have a smoke; hence a lower and an injection time more bereve so as not to give too much advance.
Continuous speech much do with a test just done, I lowered the geometry up to 20% with a coarse proportion by taking the values of the map from 20mm3 to 40mm3 60mm3 and facebdo so 80 and 100mm3, with a lowering of the geometry of the proportional, the map turbo set to 1.3 bar, so I guess I should climb slowly and then stop at 1.3 bar with a geometry so the cut does not ? so, of course, at 2200 rpm am full load is located 100mm3 pressure and still a 1.2 but rises without stopping up to 1.55 bar and then stand there and squat down a bit after 3500 rpm, this is not me back, because if the pressure target ? 1.3 bar, I get 1.55 from the diagnosis ? as absolute pressure is 1.48 bar, when I tell it to stop at 1.3, and the cutting of the net, the geometry of the 20%? I can't explain this thing, I made a map for a 147 with dpf, the same engine we did a test with the map-informed 92mm3 maximum injection and he did not have this problem of turbo pressure target 1.4 measured 1.424 maximum, my shoots, so also the geometry is very low, perhaps it will be for the lack of precatalizzatore that does not create pressures that hinder the running of the turbo, the hell with the original map the turbo comes to me at 1.4 with pressure gauge
Yes I saw that you have them rescaled up to 100mm3... But it seems to me that there are inaccuracies, look at the axis referred to the iq minimum, why ? modified? Then there are the valari lower than the ori, how ? can? We are talking about the same map? :-)
With regard to the rail, I would not have changed the axis, but only the part of the "high", but if you've done the comti right it's good enough...
with regard to the adjustment of the vgt mail always log, but I think you will have any mechanical problem, why? even I have the precat, Mario even have it all straight yet we have problems!
Yes, I confirm that I have emptied the precat, and you say? of pi?...egr closed with the flange on the exhaust manifold...but honestly I did not create the problem...i have 1.5 medium...never have problems...even the xk? one does not ? that is always l? with the foot resting on the floor
tidus...if you have any doubts go to any turbista that has a pressure gauge to verify the functionality? the actuator...
Cominciavoba to think of it I also, the vgt gets to close to 27%, but the geometry is moving well, the only doubt ? if the auttuatore is a little loose, and the fact that it does not follow lanprex goal on Wednesday? I install the new map to see if the problem ? the pressure sensor since 1.5 bar reads 0.1 bar less and 1.0 reads well
Now prov? to give depression direct to the actuator and the monitor? the depression with vacuum gauge to see if there are leaks
page of my map, it seems fair to me continuoare to pollute this thread
then, I have done some tests from map-informed and not informed, now that the turbo ? ok, it all depends on the map?ambda, this is because of too much fuel after 3000 rpm from my test and too I speak of over 94mm3 real lowers the performance, in fact, on the map fooled the lambda is not touched because it serves to touch it, but after 3,000 rpm it cuts the 80mm3 that we rose from the map and gives us a delivery after 3,000 rpm similar to the original but with more power, on the map informed us we usually lambda fixed at 1.0, or - for all values, this means that after a certain number of laps the performance suffering too much fuel, only air and does not burn and therefore the more smoke that lamentavamo I and mario. for the discourse of readiness enough to work on an overboost on the map advised to have a readiness best for even them is slowed a bit by an overboost original and a bit from the map lambda that does not allow you to climb up of fuel without a measure satisfactory to the map of air
Write permission
Quote