according to me no
according to me no
as should be made?
Sn with the phone and just drive, Click on my name and I will send for and **** that I send them to a friend I get them to see him if sn is well done ...
As required by the regulations and prohibited conduct you require 1° of warning.Originally Written by carfree
Unshared knowledge remains an end in itself.
Ok, thanks.
And excuse me ...
can someone help me to understand the logic of this map??
if the engine mounts the turbo on the ARL, it is correct to set the from map the original values n75 to the ARL, or is it better to leave the original disk?
listen to me wait anyway you answer someone, but I will say leave her...
the machine we told you yesterday that you go bad enough ... leave her and work on that .. and solve all the problems ... except that you want to await an advice from some expert ... then go for it I personally I'll recommend this ,..
the machine goes wrong, both from the original to be mapped, with both n75's arl is with n75 of the disk...
the my problem is to understand how must work this turbine that I have mounted,
the map n75 controls the variable geometry of the turbine and is made following the flussometria of the same...
to the reason of logic, it is a good thing to adapt the map n75 of the disk to the values of the ARL, this is because the base is identical, the cams are identical, the injectors are identical, only changes the turbo and ic...
that said, at least I know for certain that it is not a problem of the map but it is a physical problem, maybe a westegate too long, maybe the flywheel and clutch too consumed, can be anything, but at least I cast out the doubt and know if you must work with the values of the ARL...
it is capable to have said some bullshit, only the experts could get myself in the doubt, but I do not understand xk do not respond...
oh well maybe .. not connected .. for this do not respond
anyway .. the units are also identical right or what to change ?
Quote
