I don't seem to be uncivil or rude...advice: avoid the parentheses...
I don't seem to be uncivil or rude...advice: avoid the parentheses...
I think it is useless to specify basic concepts...all qu? no problem!!
munro I think like you... in the cr and pd, I prefer working on advances pi? that increase significantly the prex turbo x! but as in every job, each has its own method
Also, according to me, better not to touch them, if you calculate bad the exhaust gas temperatures rise too much, and you ricshia.
Let us remember that x will? manufacturers want x nn be too much competition in both the x back in to some of the regulations the car, leave management software, coarse and nn optimal, or better, with parameters below the actual potential? also x as confirmed by other users. In my case I do applications big turbo and only significantly changing some of the maps I can have response times similar to the original, taking x as the turbolag delays few or non-existent.
I ask a question on a vehicle where it is ? decided to take a strong increase in performance you would prefer to work on pressure turbo or advances, and pressures?
in my small way, I have learned that every car ? a story ,
in parit? version I happened to have diversity? ,
for wear and tear or parts poor/economic replaced over time
it leads you to behave accordingly in mapping
ori or the mod that is the car if you need to anticipate the injection
it is anticipated![]()
since there are opinions controstanti on the change of the advances, I pray all to say your thinking about specifying the reasons, perhaps using examples technical or practical examples!!!
So let's see if you**** these popular rumor.
In a world of crazy normal is crazy
I say I supermegaprincipiante, I would increase in an engine is that ? a bit knackered and chilometrato, I would leave them instead of the original in a new engine