Page 2 of 3 PrimaBefore 123 LastUltima
Results 11 to 20 of 21

Discussion: monster s4r 2001

  1. #11
    BEGINNER
    Date Of Registration
    Aug 2014
    Messages
    16
    In addition to the kess1, which the other interface reads and writes on the marelli IAW59?

  2. #12
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Jul 2013
    The resort
    Bertinoro RA
    Messages
    193
    MPPS, KESS V2, Gallo, V53, etc.. But in addition to read and write, you have to be sure to correct the checksum in writing.

    M999
    Do not step files and more in private!! Post your requests on the forum.

  3. #13
    BEGINNER
    Date Of Registration
    Aug 2014
    Messages
    16
    In what sense? Why? some interfaces do not recognize or correct the chechsum?

  4. #14
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Jul 2013
    The resort
    Bertinoro RA
    Messages
    193
    MPPS, for example, didn't correct him.

    M999
    Do not step files and more in private!! Post your requests on the forum.

  5. #15
    BEGINNER
    Date Of Registration
    Aug 2014
    Messages
    16
    Wait, I'm lost for a moment! Up to the interfaces generally there are, then you need to consider the checksum, which in essence would be a recognition code of the file to the ecu, right? The fact that the Mpps didn't correct him, in substance, what does it mean?

    When I go to read, the hardware reads me the checksum on the file? When I edit the file ori and the rewrite in the ecu shouldn't I always have the same checksum? Why should I fix it? the cio? what it may take to ensure that should fix it?

    Thanks,
    Pask

  6. #16
    THE ACTIVE USER (FO) (OF) L'avatar di legendaryslave
    Date Of Registration
    Dec 2012
    The resort
    RAIANO(AQ)
    Et
    44
    Messages
    1,985
    Citazione Originally Written by revan Visualizza Messaggio
    Wait, I'm lost for a moment! Up to the interfaces generally there are, then you need to consider the checksum, which in essence would be a recognition code of the file to the ecu, right? The fact that the Mpps didn't correct him, in substance, what does it mean?

    When I go to read, the hardware reads me the checksum on the file? When I edit the file ori and the rewrite in the ecu shouldn't I always have the same checksum? Why should I fix it? the cio? what it may take to ensure that should fix it?

    Thanks,
    Pask
    The cks and an algorithm for the control of integrity? the sequence of bytes by changing the boxes in the sum, we say it is not pi? the same and then be rewarded the new result but I know that on this management does not need to be recalculated even if personally I always did it with winols
    while the others are still talking about us, we have already solved the problem
    GARAGE0864 ԼЄƓЄƝƊƛƦƳƧԼƛVЄ

  7. #17
    BEGINNER
    Date Of Registration
    Aug 2014
    Messages
    16
    Then if we think the software winols what kind of modification should make the mpps?

  8. #18
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Jul 2013
    The resort
    Bertinoro RA
    Messages
    193
    Exact legendaryslave. Also I always correct while turning items that are not needed... but I do not trust, that is pi? a control unit that 1 minute of time to correct a checksum!!

    revan, some SW to work on the maps the recalculate, I spoke of the interfaces that in some cases they do it automatically in writing or not. MPPS, as the citi, there is no change, it simply writes the map cos? as put it by.

    M999
    Do not step files and more in private!! Post your requests on the forum.

  9. #19
    BEGINNER
    Date Of Registration
    Aug 2014
    Messages
    16
    This, then, means that if she does not, the interface should cmq provide for me to use a software that can do it, right? The only limit would be this?

  10. #20
    THE ACTIVE USER (FO) (OF) L'avatar di legendaryslave
    Date Of Registration
    Dec 2012
    The resort
    RAIANO(AQ)
    Et
    44
    Messages
    1,985
    Citazione Originally Written by revan Visualizza Messaggio
    This, then, means that if she does not, the interface should cmq provide for me to use a software that can do it, right? The only limit would be this?

    Exactly
    while the others are still talking about us, we have already solved the problem
    GARAGE0864 ԼЄƓЄƝƊƛƦƳƧԼƛVЄ

Page 2 of 3 PrimaBefore 123 LastUltima

Write permission

  • You you can not post new threads
  • You you can not send answers
  • You you can not send attachments
  • You you can not edit your posts
  •