To overcome 100mm3 injected on edc16c39

[franco75]

1E2EC in fact it looks like a map 4x10. I got up, without looking good bp. The damos not the from but ? the third limiter of the vgt since only raising the other 2 before bed was pi? 75% while also raising this,even if I don't have very well understood what are the bp,the first may be atmospheric pressure and the second I just don't understand.
Should I raise just the tips to 6144, according to you, leaving the part that goes down is the original? So in the end what matters to me ? to close the geometry more than 75% up to just before 2000 rpm.
1E7966 according to the damos ? a map 16x16 and not 10x16, as it says in the ecm.

By BP might be a map pressure atomosferica/Temperature exhaust?

[SandroMarciano]

By BP might be a map pressure atomosferica/Temperature exhaust?

the damos says "Map for calculating the maximum allowable set value from the atmospheric pressure and consumption"

In practice ? a limiter opening of the vnt that works, based on the p_atm and on the fuel consumption expressed in l/h

[jacktheripper2]

I just checked the latest map,the required torque during the start-up,so meanwhile, I had forgotten to change the bp that are a p? different,then, strangely, the ecm such as 10x16 on the file of the 8v while the file ori of the chroma from him as 16x16. Now I try to put back the stock at this point

[bart]

I just checked the latest map,the required torque during the start-up,so meanwhile, I had forgotten to change the bp that are a p? different,then, strangely, the ecm such as 10x16 on the file of the 8v while the file ori of the chroma from him as 16x16. Now I try to put back the stock at this point

In fact, looking at it, it gave me the impression of a 16x16 map pasted on a 10x16, for this I reported!

Thanks for the previous answer!
Now I'm not on my pc, but as soon as I arrive home d? a look and see if I can answer your question...

[rego88]

I want to have my say.... the limiters as a function of the speed, in theory, should be in the nm of torque, but ? the state tried to bring those to the decimal value of 11000 to see if it actually limits even to 100mg??

[SandroMarciano]

I want to have my say.... the limiters as a function of the speed, in theory, should be in the nm of torque, but ? the state tried to bring those to the decimal value of 11000 to see if it actually limits even to 100mg??

the problem is the address that I posted I, torque limiters for single gear are correct.

[jacktheripper2]

I don't understand where is the problem in the addresses you posted.
Also, now I repeat, that I read 110mm3 without any problem. I also tried to remove the mod to the bit of rail that I had changed too much for it? sometimes I still have error fuel pressure and from the log I see piccate to 1800 bar.
On the map of the vnt given that the damos I don't see (why? me such as 'bosch map' winols), can I ask you if ? a map 4x10? Why winols me the cos? in fact, for? I would like confirmation from the damos. And if so, I don't understand what is the "continuation" to 6144.

As already said the limiters ? torque gear should be good to go.
Eye also that I was not limited to 100mg but 100mm3 that ? well different.

[SandroMarciano]

I don't understand where is the problem in the addresses you posted.
Also, now I repeat, that I read 110mm3 without any problem. I also tried to remove the mod to the bit of rail that I had changed too much for it? sometimes I still have error fuel pressure and from the log I see piccate to 1800 bar.
On the map of the vnt given that the damos I don't see (why? me such as 'bosch map' winols), can I ask you if ? a map 4x10? Why winols me the cos? in fact, for? I would like confirmation from the damos. And if so, I don't understand what is the "continuation" to 6144.

you, ? a 4x10, the continuation ? remained why? it may be defined also as an 8x10, for example, but the points from the axis, probably a version of the sw ir? the old era cos?...
To avoid the error that rails tries to lower the pressure, why? if the pump hp can't manage to send diesel fuel with enough pressure profile follow? a peak right in the moment you leave the pedal (effect due to the stroke of the ram) that is squirt the pressure at the stars!

[mariodarkblue]

Hi jack...you have read elsewhere...I followed the story of your point...can I ask you at the end now as you're put to ****llo engine?turbine?operating pressures??
I ask you this why? I see that you want to go beyond the 110mm3...

[jacktheripper2]

you, ? a 4x10, the continuation ? remained why? it may be defined also as an 8x10, for example, but the points from the axis, probably a version of the sw ir? the old era cos?...
To avoid the error that rails tries to lower the pressure, why? if the pump hp can't manage to send diesel fuel with enough pressure profile follow? a peak right in the moment you leave the pedal (effect due to the stroke of the ram) that is squirt the pressure at the stars!

I tried to redo the map rail only raising on 80-100-120mm3 (a little bit in the bottom). I'm trying to make a map with everything scaled to 120mm3,then decide? if you ask for less with the lambda so much, even why? to inject them in the top I need to stay really low type is set to 0.8, now I have left to 0.85 for 1200-1400mg of air, and then to rise to 0.9 and 0.95 starting to lower to about 700mg.
Now also I have copied the maps of the time of the delta 1.9 twin turbo that ? climbing up to 100mm3 and injectors better than the 1.9 150. I saw for? that has advances completely different compared to the map of the 1.9 150 cv, for? it seems to me that they have the same compression ratio and the engine ? the same, change the injectors,pump and turbine ? a two-stage.
For now I prefer to leave mine, though honestly I still don't understand if the injectors plus I should lower them.
According to you, as they are the ones that I did? I was always a few degrees after tdc, at 4500 rpm, with 1150us (table value to 1600 bar are not converted into us real), I should have 30.3 degrees to finish the fuel injection at tdc, let's say that divemtano about to 28.8 degrees, with 130/140 bar in the pi? of the rail (from what I understand you need to subtract 1 degree for every 100 bar in the pi? to rail about), if you see it for? that would mean an increase of 4.3 degrees with respect to the ori 24,49 degrees at 4500 rpm, which seems to me an increase of a little too much, then I calculated the fuel injection at tdc (which was 30.3 degrees) and I removed the 15%? the increase of the injectors, then going to give some degree in the pi? after the pms at low speed in order to load the better the turbine.