problem checksum correction for marelli opel

[cawadany]

errecinque ,I have not done other than to give in meal, and modified file in winols that I said that was okay, I guess there is no one that can see if the cks file is a place for the eye

The same thing I did, but I gave that 2 cks were not correct. However, I uploaded the ori, and then imported the mod, and told me that the cks was not correct. If instead the load directly to the mod tells me that the cks is ok

[Andrea1]

The same thing I did, but I gave that 2 cks were not correct. However, I uploaded the ori, and then imported the mod, and told me that the cks was not correct. If instead the load directly to the mod tells me that the cks is ok

same thing

[ugoboss]

however, the file is written and the cks was ok, that was the important thing, therefore, very likely that there are more streets to reach his goal, as soon as I have a minito control.

[ugoboss]

it is very likely that these files have different cks valid, which taken individually are recognized as good, but if they are compared with what we charge as the original do not match and are correct, I think, is the explanation more logical.

[cawadany]

it is very likely that these files have different cks valid, which taken individually are recognized as good, but if they are compared with what we charge as the original do not match and are correct, I think, is the explanation more logical.

Surely it will be so.... I tried to correct the cks (starting from the ori and mod compared) and export the file. This file is with cks corrected in any case, whether imported alone, or in comparison with the ori.

[giuseppe89]

Guys this thing is not I happen.As soon as I have time, I take the file ori, redo the same changes and without passing it to winols I try to compare it to...at least understand if I correct it with winols or something...to me, it gave an error message regarding the 2 checksum winols

[Errecinque]

errecinque ,I have not done other than to give in meal, and modified file in winols that I said that was okay, I guess there is no one that can see if the cks file is a place for the eye

Ahh ok I thought I saw him through some numbers. For example, on the ecm there is the calculator cks, I thought I had used that. slowly I get to understand how to use

[Errecinque]

But because you are worried about the chk on those ecu's?
The control on the chk is not active on those ecu's, as also on the 6jf and 6f3, on 8f instead is active and the second time you start the car is not starting.

I have made dozens of 6O2, and 6O3, the ecm does not correct the chk on these ecu, and the tool that I use to write them down even, but I never had no problem.

Well thanks for the info.....you never stop learning

[Andrea1]

But because you are worried about the chk on those ecu's?
The control on the chk is not active on those ecu's, as also on the 6jf and 6f3, on 8f instead is active and the second time you start the car is not starting.

I have made dozens of 6O2, and 6O3, the ecm does not correct the chk on these ecu, and the tool that I use to write them down even, but I never had no problem.

I did not know it! Thanks for the information!

[dragusdrake]

it seems strange to me what you say, it is usually the programmer that corrects the checksum, how can you say that the programmer is not you correct him? that programmer uses