Opinion the map 159 - 1.9 Mjet 150 hp

[paolo159]

Sandro and I have completed the lim 1cc0f8, not can I edit it from grid why? the ecm will not allow me...take a look as soon as you have a bit of time to see if ? done in the right way...the last time for a bit, forgot I cut the fuel :-)

I have slightly changed the IQ of the previous one and mod. maps pedal up to 500nm...
the correct time

[paolo159]

ok Sandro, in fact, I tried and well-known motor? higher...also why? it seems that nullify the effect of the pre-injection.. do? a test, thus reducing the time to see if it improves compared to the times ori.

[paolo159]

Sandro I loaded the map step13c, supply much more? linear thanks to the axes appropriate, as you told me, despite having increased still maps the pedal seems to be that it delivers less power...
another thing that I realized ? I had adjusted the lim couple to get to 500 nm required in the map I have loaded...


Other tips???

[paolo159]

here is the latest update...
made more small tweaks and lim correct torque.

Appearance opinions ;-)

[tidus1985]

then, I give you my opinion,
maps pedal - holes are all the same including break point
torque limiter - useless to request maps from the pedal more than 500 mm3 of diesel oil, according to lim torque ? next to first slow you down more than 500nm
maps lambda - I don't know what criteria you have changed you could explain it to me?
limiters diesel - they can go,but there are others around that block to 100mm3, do a search with the ecm for the values set to 10000 points, and with a little intuition to find them
Advances - you did the opposite of what you said sandro, act more on the range 1500-3500 rpm and less on the other, where the injections finoscono already before tdc
Rail - you have a dpf then you can get maybe up to 1650-1680 to have the injection times smaller

[paolo159]

hi Tidus first of all thanks for the great advice!

for maps of the pedal I noticed that changing the bp, we have, for example 400 rpm as in the other does not c'?.*****and do I make them all the same? with regard to the exceed 500nm you're right but not me I was worried about ir? of much seen that, in principle, not the excess (only in a couple of spots I know that I have given 514)


with regard to the maps lambda I have not taken any logic, for the moment I had put in the second floor waiting to remove the dpf, then saw that, however, due to lack of time I have not been able to do it if you give me an advice on the logic to be taken in the presence of the dpf I don't mind :-)

lim diesel, I've searched, I've read from your 3d that there are others around but I thought I would leave cos? at the moment since I have not gone beyond the 100mm^3 with the times...and you say that I should of improving them even if I don't pass the 100mm^3?

for the rail you say that is not the risk, up to 1650-1680?

thank you so much for the precious help!!!

[SandroMarciano]

for the pedal to do so, at least, have in the last 4 columns have the same value (each line) and make sure that the value of pi? high go above 500Nm, otherwise you'll use it all.

The machine anyway ? likely to go less than before, why? you now have the lambda to the limit, instead before you did not have anything (practically).

For down payments follow what you said tidus.
The limiters let them well as a 100mm^3/s, on a machine with dpf for sure I would not go above (among others not ? said that uses them to the discourse lambda) and by the way, I would not go above if I wanted a mod without smoke reliable...

The rail you see yourself, I usually leave it gold, even why? the post injections having the dpf are not a cos? negative... 1700bar (only when you can serve) not break anything...

[paolo159]

Thanks Sandro!
I've corrected the down-payment and with regard to the rail I gave light increases also in mm^3 on the lower, I would like to do a trial to see if it increments the data in that way I can give them a little bit more? readiness

[paolo159]

here are the changes

[SandroMarciano]

Thanks Sandro!
I've corrected the down-payment and with regard to the rail I gave light increases also in mm^3 on the lower, I would like to do a trial to see if it increments the data in that way I can give them a little bit more? readiness

readiness maybe, consumption low no speech... old... still testing...