Turbine 1.9 jtd 140/150 hp 16v hybridized on the 1.9 jtdm 8v 120 hp

[tidus1985]

Then I map that pike up to 1.9 stable 1.7 1.8 , PID, I don't know to adjust it I don't even know where they are in the map as touch them

[SandroMarciano]

the problem ? that if you do not adjust the pid would not be able to ever have a constant pressure. If you are looking for the post of jacktheriper on gpunto them sent all the addresses

[tidus1985]

that I immediately see, you say that now holds relatively constant. but it will be an enrichment for me thanks a lot sandro I keep you updated, for the cronoca with 100mm3 I do not hear differences if not minimal, I will try with 110 mm3, but I have to hold the rail almost to 200 bar above between 2250 and 3500 not to give advances more than 4 degrees already so I finish the injection at 9? after the pms then for strength, rovinera the pump turn 1400 bar instead of 1200? pesno, no, prerssione max and always 1730 nn more

[SandroMarciano]

Strange that you can't feel the difference, I, as from day to night, I went from 1.6 bar max with the 1749 1.7 with this, push much more? full-bodied, less smoke and fly that trembled up to 2800rpm from the 4th onwards... injecting ever 100mm^3, now an injection-110 with pressures above but a little bit of smoke c'? inevitably. True ? for? the 156 mount an intercooler pi? generous (even if small)

[tidus1985]

You tell sandro that now after last night, is stable at 1.7 1.8 bar with a maximum peak-to-9 on the fast transient, but that with 100mm3 of diesel not felt a particular difference, I've noticed a few things, to warm the impeller has a bit of the game, we are talking less than a mm, cold-no in fact when I had open didn't have one, but not die no oil or anything, after 1.6 bar boost begins to whistle more? strong, but ? always a whistle of air bearings, do not lubricate or cos, and from 1.7 onwards, I have always u. While the phenomenon of ffffrrr I co. The other turbine, premettto that 1.7 bar them from 2500 rpm onwards, I knstallato a hose on the drain pipe to elongate it since? the old downpipe came in

[tidus1985]

I think I figured cos ? that whistle, the hose on the discharge loses, the side facing the turbine, it is practically between the catalyst and the flange that connects to the downpipe, lose a little, for now ? a problem, as soon as I have time I weld

[Franky Sbrock]

Hello, novit??
I incoriusendo much your project!
I state that does not ? a critical, but let's say a personal doubt that that follows.
Cos? doing this will not be to distort the nature of a diesel engine? In the sense:
Having a turbine that comes into pressure from 2500 rpm, does not move the torque curve too high, generating a peak and not a curve homogeneous? When you talk about a motor that has a beautiful back, typically, you're talking about a diesel, since? the curve of the torque delivery ? very linear, with no peaks, and that starts to be constant by the 1800/2000 rpm.
I believe that you do not use the car in the track, but you make it a daily use, and with the times we live in, it is advisable to have a machine that is more exploitable. A diesel that starts to pull after the 2500 rpm consumes like a diesel, but will not go? never as a gasoline...

[tidus1985]

I have reflected badly, already part 1.6 bar at 2000 rpm, but of course I can not have the power that could let me have the air blown at the gt2256v via the flywheel in the original, but pulls strong at 2000 rpm and not think of, the surplus of the turbine los ing strong after 2500 rpm, but in the short montero flywheel and clutch fit and potro take advantage of the time permitted available from the new turbo already at 1500 rpm

[tidus1985]

Sandro on that hai could you tell me at what temperature arrive the collectors with the gt2256v and 110mm3 of diesel? Those of cast iron hold up? I suppose to reach 600? or more?

[Franky Sbrock]

Thank you, now ? pi? clear
Actually the flywheel and clutch to the original reggerebbero all that torque developed by the new turbine at low speeds.

ps: you know not how much torque is able to support the exchange of the original 1.9 jtd 8v? I ask why? I do not know...