The map informed delta 1.6 mjt

[giuseppe89]

Hello Tranky I'm sorry if I answer only now,with regard to specular values to what should I do with the case in which map are you referring to? The rail? For the discourse to anticipate the demand of the maximum prx rail 5mm3 want to create a new bp from 85mm3 having already such pressures? To me the pump is ready for the 90's? The turbo should be a garrett gtb 1446Z that to what I already know, ori works at 1.6 bar but I never made the log from the ori, but as soon as I can I'll one in order to understand how behaves the car with no changes. The map of pedal feel. Last question to scale the bp if, for example, in the map of the rail where I : 500 - 750 -1000 - 1250 - 1500 - 1750 - 2000 - 2250 -2500 - 2750 - 3000 -3500 - 4000 - 5000 - 6000 - 7000 them modifiCassi in this way, or 500 - 750 - 1000- 1250 - 1500 - 1750 - 2000 - 2250 -2500 -3000- 4000 - 5000 - 6000 - 7000 - 8000 - 9000? It would be more correct? Of course, I should redo half the table, however, I think it is a more precise work. I advice? I'm sorry if I break the bales eh hahaha

[tranky]

Hello Tranky I'm sorry if I answer only now,with regard to specular values to what should I do with the case in which map are you referring to? The rail? For the discourse to anticipate the demand of the maximum prx rail 5mm3 want to create a new bp from 85mm3 having already such pressures? To me the pump is ready for the 90's? The turbo should be a garrett gtb 1446Z that to what I already know, ori works at 1.6 bar but I never made the log from the ori, but as soon as I can I'll one in order to understand how behaves the car with no changes. The map of pedal feel. Last question to scale the bp if, for example, in the map of the rail where I : 500 - 750 -1000 - 1250 - 1500 - 1750 - 2000 - 2250 -2500 - 2750 - 3000 -3500 - 4000 - 5000 - 6000 - 7000 them modifiCassi in this way, or 500 - 750 - 1000- 1250 - 1500 - 1750 - 2000 - 2250 -2500 -3000- 4000 - 5000 - 6000 - 7000 - 8000 - 9000? It would be more correct? Of course, I should redo half the table, however, I think it is a more precise work. I advice? I'm sorry if I break the bales eh hahaha

Do you believe, in the end changes little as long as make calculations and tax.. upload it and make a log!

[tranky]

last thing.. but the car is totally ORI ?
you have direct discharges to, do not have them, you pump the rail more, and not you ?
Explains mpo mechanically something...

[tranky]

about the gtb 1446Z I can't find directions nor compressor map to define the schemes, but I presume to keep to the regime of the +150 from the 2600 on the map (like many others).
You stay on the 2680 max 2700 and test it without overdoing it and see how it behaves.
values mirrored in the map of the rail...
for the advance of the pressure -5mm3 on the bp, you'll understand what I mean, and operates in such a way that should..
to rescale the whole table rail, LETS LOSE!!!
you do not need to practically nothing.. you could do a good job only by climbing to the iq new and by removing the values xx25 xx50 unnecessary to calculate the ecu.
Note that for every change of the map rail, if you change some of the pressure on the iq/rpm you have to ricalcolarti the advances or the times..
the more pressure you have, the less time it requires, and increase the degrees.. let's say that it is not just that, but timing is so, then the game enters the c factor.u.l.or.metro.. you have to do is log in and see the iq if salt, how much salt, if it follows the turbo, if cala something, fix any lambda and vgt, etc, etc, etc..
try to unlock all the limiters that you find it and upload it..
I look forward to a log!

[switing63]

I looked at the changes to the map, let's say 1D5784 the one that should be a limiter, I though I would have stopped with the 9000 to the column 8192, the next 9011 and the following the let original. I is a suspicion, because if I take the last column 10650 and I divide it by 8192, I is 130, and this makes me think that this map is used, let's say 2 times, one as the limiter as a function of pedal position and a function of the water temperature, because that 130 I stink so much of the maximum temperature of the water, and then a time exceeded 100%, which applies both to 100% pedal position, and as 100 degrees of temperature of the water. If that were the case, I'd keep the original values for the cut in the diesel fuel, so that when the temperature of the motor increases too much to be protected from the cutting of the diesel. Regarding the log above the maximum value of air that I have seen is 990 in close proximity to 2144 rpm and with turbo pressure at 2684, and then taking into account of the calculations that you used previously hardly be able to inject more than 80mm3 because the maps lambda you will cut the injection.

[tranky]

I looked at the changes to the map, let's say 1D5784 the one that should be a limiter, I though I would have stopped with the 9000 to the column 8192, the next 9011 and the following the let original. I is a suspicion, because if I take the last column 10650 and I divide it by 8192, I is 130, and this makes me think that this map is used, let's say 2 times, one as the limiter as a function of pedal position and a function of the water temperature, because that 130 I stink so much of the maximum temperature of the water, and then a time exceeded 100%, which applies both to 100% pedal position, and as 100 degrees of temperature of the water. If that were the case, I'd keep the original values for the cut in the diesel fuel, so that when the temperature of the motor increases too much to be protected from the cutting of the diesel. Regarding the log above the maximum value of air that I have seen is 990 in close proximity to 2144 rpm and with turbo pressure at 2684, and then taking into account of the calculations that you used previously hardly be able to inject more than 80mm3 because the maps lambda you will cut the injection.

I could say a nonsense since I do not know the car, but 1D5784 brings me more towards the management EGR IQ..

[giuseppe89]

Guys sorry but I have had no problems with the change robottizato now I think I've solved but I'm still shooting for assicurarmene..***** o the car is totally ori apart from the dpf deleted, its but a short I will use a downpipe.then for the next Step, I would like to go the turbo of the 2.0 mjt with respective injectors and pump but more in there.I commit myself to working on the map now

[giuseppe89]

Guys I have a doubt, and I fixed the map rail, and since I was there I calculated for 100 mm3 now I have to adjust the one that the ecm called rail pressure, objective, and noticing that gold is always greater than the map rail,I was wondering what is the function of this map? Correct the pressure if it exceeds that value set and returns it within the limits? How do I moddarla? I am always slightly above the rail, or do I do the same?

[giuseppe89]

I correct and I'll explain better with an example: let's take in consideration in the map table prex rail to address 1fb840 the value of pressure given to the IQ from 70 mm3 at 1000 rpm and corresponds to the 7800 or 780 bar and here we are,and if I am going to try then in the table of the map rail pressure objective to address 1faffc the same value given for the IQ of 70 mm3 to 1000 rpm, I find myself a lower value or 5450 then 545 bar. How they are used these values? What is the strategy used by the ecu? Acts as a mica from "limitarore" this map of the rail? By correcting the request of another map? I'm stuck on this point is unfortunately I don't have time to do a test if not in the weekend...thanks to all

[giuseppe89]

Of course, I'm talking about the map ori without changes