Opinion the map Alfa Gt MJET

[GPoint]

I tried to make some changes based on what I understand is that among the various discussions, I used only the driver of ecm t for not coplicarmi life too much. I trust in some criticism.

[marco]

hello gpoint I'm not just saying I have the professor but you say that this map lai has made payment from one who does this work, I saw the maps touch I think lehai made you, I'll explain better, there is a map as well as' mass, which I'm sure the picture will become like a christmas tree with a few light on

[GPoint]

hello gpoint I'm not just saying I have the professor but you say that this map lai has made payment from one who does this work, I saw the maps touch I think lehai made you, I'll explain better, there is a map as well as' mass, which I'm sure the picture will become like a christmas tree with a few light on

Hello Mark, I figured I did not take it absolutely. However, I did not understand that the map you are referring to, that of the post number 21 I've made from scratch "883.726 TEST01.zip", instead of the one that I inserted at the beginning of the discussion for me has prepared a "professional" indeed "the alleged professional".
In any case, I would be also curious to understand where I went wrong, also for personal satisfaction

PS Mark didn't hold it against me too, but those H are a punch in the eye Obviously a joke, no offense.

[marco]

Nothing h are fashionable miriferisco to 1

[GPoint]

Nothing h are fashionable miriferisco to 1

The map to the post N? 1 I have done I, I ? was made in 2009\2010 when I took the car and ? remained on until a few days ago. However, never had no light on, I can assicurartelo.

[munro]

you're not there yet.....apart from the maps the pedal where you could ask for the rest ? improved....
lim couple....you can start a moddare 1250 or 1500 rpm with increments similar to the map test, but after the 2500 rpm you can delimit a 30-35% more...not the f? nothing..
the map nm>iq(quantity? diesel fuel injected) you don't need to change it to what you want to pull out you from your engine...
in fact, and scaled to give you 100mm3 of diesel...you require less pedal....429,5Nm=85,9mm3 about...and still you are limited to an iq much lower than from other maps....first of all the maps lambda.....
injection time according to me you're just out of the way...

[GPoint]

you're not there yet.....apart from the maps the pedal where you could ask for the rest ? improved....
lim couple....you can start a moddare 1250 or 1500 rpm with increments similar to the map test, but after the 2500 rpm you can delimit a 30-35% more...not the f? nothing..
the map nm>iq(quantity? diesel fuel injected) you don't need to change it to what you want to pull out you from your engine...
in fact, and scaled to give you 100mm3 of diesel...you require less pedal....429,5Nm=85,9mm3 about...and still you are limited to an iq much lower than from other maps....first of all the maps lambda.....
injection time according to me you're just out of the way...

Thanks munro for the critical, in fact, was a test why? I have some clear relationships. Among the quantity? fuel injected and the required torque c'? a fixed ratio? In the sense, where I've written 429,5 Nm=85,9mm3 to get those nm serves approximately 86mm3 of diesel? For injection times I tried to make a relationship between the scales, but maybe I didn't understand correctly the meaning in the other discussions. I thought that lengthen the time it meant the most? diesel.

[munro]

certain that lengthen the time means more diesel....and in fact I do not say no to the contrary..I only said that according to me you are out of the way with the change of the times...
for the iq and the torque if you look in the map nm>iq you'll see that for 500nm inject(theoretically) 100mm3 of diesel...
then for 1 mm3 of fuel you have 5nm of torque...
I repeat ? a theoretical calculation why? does not take into account the torque of the internal resistance of the motor etc...
but that can? be adopted to follow a logical line-editing anyway...

[GPoint]

certain that lengthen the time means more diesel....and in fact I do not say no to the contrary..I only said that according to me you are out of the way with the change of the times...
for the iq and the torque if you look in the map nm>iq you'll see that for 500nm inject(theoretically) 100mm3 of diesel...
then for 1 mm3 of fuel you have 5nm of torque...
I repeat ? a theoretical calculation why? does not take into account the torque of the internal resistance of the motor etc...
but that can? be adopted to follow a logical line-editing anyway...

So if I understand, using the "base map", you can get the increments correct. In my case you mean that I'm wrong because? according to my map the pedal increases that I have given is in the map diesel that that time would lead me to a value of pi? top of that actually required?

[munro]

but what? the base map? perhaps you are referring to the nm>iq?? if you believe you did not understand even the logic of the functioning of this ecu...all part of the request in torque that you can with the pedal and on the map....through various other maps and corrections the ecu v? to choose the amount of diesel just to give you to have a given torque and power....
then the map nm>iq is used by the ecu to convert the value in the torque in the diesel and then go to choose the amount of fuel suitable to be injected in the map with the times...