ok carmageddon, in fact, it was not my intention to recommend a change to the genre.
in the case on my engine bmw psa of my mini with electronic med17 or mev17 I don't remember, I decide to empty the cat. how do you suggest I should do?
of course, I want to leave the first probe.
do you believe that the original unit could settle the mixture equally?
also on the second lambda probe I advice the electric circuit or the minicat to avoid the light?
and again (sorry for the many questions) if I decide not to put any emulator on the second lambda and I'll just reset the light using the obd and I would work with the ecu in openloopo or closedloop don't remember the mode, I'd get better or worse performance to have the cat put.
at the end of the ecu with the accelerator pedal to 100% takes into account the autoadattivit? etc etc, or does work everything to the max not caring about consumption and pollution.
I'd like to shed some light on this topic, why? many on the forums keep saying that removing the cat on the new ecu gives the problems like performance, even if they are convinced of the contrary, a what ? the environment, another ? have a cap real inside the engine hood at 10 cm from the exhaust valves.
what can you tell me about that? if you like, of course, to talk about ;-)
thanks happy holidays to all
which mini do you have?
naturally aspirated or turbo?
when it intervenes electronically to the second probe (diagnostic probe) ? always better to disable it, even in the case of a simple remapping of this ? one of the factors that affect the strategy of the autoadattativit? to move...then via the above-mentioned probe...but the work to perfection should be performed on the file management and not with emulators or the other.
in modern engines there? you are referring to ? the relationship of motor load, group 3 signals fundamental : manifold pressure, measured mass air flow sensor and pedal accelaratore...depending on the state of wear of the sensors has a given motor load (100 if all the sensors are 100% and an average with reference to the value of pi? low if only one of these ? worn or not returns to the ecu an ideal value).
the motors controlled by a probe, wideband have control over the fuel mixture, while those with the probe in narrow-band no...but no matter this fact ? important to tell the ecu what we want from her, and not to be conditioned by what he would do to her.
if you put the hands with cognition, you can do a good job also on the aspirated engines.
the title speaks of the alfa mito, we try to stick to the topic of the discussion
Okay, returning to the sermon on the alfa mito. Pretending that we are talking about the alfa mito, but I understand that the speech ? quite generalized.
In practice, then the usual software such as ecm titanium, for example, does not allow you to do a complete job at 100x100 from what I understood, why? does not allow to disable the second probe right?
Then on a turbo gasoline engine or naturally aspirated gasoline that is, if you read the ecu and change with the ecm, we can do virtually nothing.
Excellent as what
Ps: my mini ? sucked, so I think it is a 17 meV siemens ecu, med 17 it seems to me that his turbo.
With what software you disable the second probe on the ecu? You must open the file with a software or a text editor to do this? Mamma mia, what a slaughter
aspirated euro4/5 = mev17
turbo direct injection euro 4/5 = med17
for the tjet, as with all other ecu's existing ? need to know how to disable the lambda, the dtc and the strategy associated with it to do the job complete...the latest versions of titanium have only 33% of this function