Page 4 of 7 PrimaBefore ... 23456 ... LastUltima
Results 31 to 40 of 63
  1. #31
    Administrator L'avatar di msport (exil77grande)
    Date Of Registration
    Jun 2012
    The resort
    Chiplandia
    Messages
    4,817
    not all of the edc16c39 require 45 minutes to read them.
    [IMG]http://bannerbreak*****/banners/3/563/135700419269659378.gif[/IMG]

  2. #32
    ACTIVE USER (OF) L'avatar di sportknight
    Date Of Registration
    Dec 2012
    The resort
    Matera
    Messages
    1,423
    sorry guys,on a 159 2.0 170cv I tried to remove the dpf with time...what I wonder ? that are 3 or 4 months that we run without problems...

    I was expecting the light engine, and instead...

  3. #33
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Feb 2013
    Messages
    708
    so if you disable only the single bit about 1.9 euro 4 does not, you can regenerations and not c'? need to do the other mod usual?
    or ? only to have more written in the diagnosis, staging dpf or probe..

  4. #34
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Feb 2013
    Messages
    708
    nobody answers me?

  5. #35
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Oct 2012
    Messages
    485
    I'm not so much convinced.... I have a 147 1.9 150cv without dpf, I physically removed the lambda sensor, and also if the port bit to 0 instead? 512, I, however, the failure diagnosis.... so according to me ? to see only the preparation

  6. #36
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Feb 2013
    Messages
    708
    b? but in the diagnosis and no more with the lambda probe?
    then you need to find the bit error and delete it... but who knows... I do not think that there is someone for me to say...

  7. #37
    Banned
    Date Of Registration
    Feb 2013
    Messages
    14
    The problem of the programs remove DPF ? that removes the error, or the entire table and practically stop them,
    the machine seems to go well, but continues to do regenerations...
    A dpf-off, well done for now, for me, must necessarily be done by hand...

  8. #38
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Oct 2012
    Messages
    485
    Citazione Originally Written by ne0h Visualizza Messaggio
    The problem of the programs remove DPF ? that removes the error, or the entire table and practically stop them,
    the machine seems to go well, but continues to do regenerations...
    A dpf-off, well done for now, for me, must necessarily be done by hand...
    a part of what you said ? true, but a part no.... taking the makkina in question, made with time.... I after 13585km are tonato to check.... and, in fact, the makkina says.... last dpf regeneration, 13585km ago.... this means that the machine will no longer regenerate, but if you put the original area errors the machine tells you the failure of the pressure sensor differential, this is also to not make the most of the regenerations.

  9. #39
    Banned
    Date Of Registration
    Feb 2013
    Messages
    14
    Sorry then, but I have always only had problems with ecusafe and stuff like that, I'm skeptical now on the functioning of those prog...

  10. #40
    BEGINNER
    Date Of Registration
    Aug 2013
    Messages
    52
    Guys, but in the end someone has done further testing of euro5? To me ? happened on a Delta 1.6 on which the downpipe ? was replaced with one ******. I have tried the file both with time and with ecusafe 2.0, do not seem to be doing more? regenerations, but the % clogging salt always and now the indicator light of the dpf ? on.

Page 4 of 7 PrimaBefore ... 23456 ... LastUltima

Write permission

  • You you can not post new threads
  • You you can not send answers
  • You you can not send attachments
  • You you can not edit your posts
  •