EDC16C - impariamola!

[tidus1985]

if you need more reach, better change the final drive ratio of the transmission, already after 4800 rpm on jtd we are almost even between the speed of the piston and the speed of the return spring of the valve, over 5200 rpm definitely make out ammeno not to review the entire distirbuzione...my opinion then

[tidus1985]

Then I put this table in the vnt found on ****** attached
as you can see at higher rpm (0 to 1000) ? closed, and around 60% then more salt rounds pi? opens up coming to about a 25%.

Then to get you have to go down the value %. For? you can't? make a case, for example, only working on the last column but toccher? to check in with the deal? of diesel fuel. A nice scab

I have had the opportunity to work for a long time on that map that I was vexed not a little, the principle ? "the proportion of closure", where more percentage ? high more close, and I can say that if the map time and well climbing you can get it to work well even in proprorzione up to 100mm3, I had done with the turbine series

[ugoboss]

if you need more reach, better change the final drive ratio of the transmission, already after 4800 rpm on jtd we are almost even between the speed of the piston and the speed of the return spring of the valve, over 5200 rpm definitely make out ammeno not to review the entire distirbuzione...my opinion then

I fully agree with.

[puntospeed1.3]

At this point, it is convenient to mod the maps of conversion? I honestly have been contrary to tap these maps. I have always kept as a guideline.

Deception for deception, so it is touching the injection timing, no?

Not s? if you looked at the map I posted, but the maps pedal-torque limiters, are slightly inveriori to 450nm of torque, then the gain will be? little or nothing without the "trick" the map

After some tests made on tdi edc16
the deceived as already imagine has a greater evil, that has more torque before the point of maximum torque.
For a quick edit, and that makes it, put it on the limiter, torque is the maximum value of the map conversion in NM, and then stretch the injections calcolandole for how much you want to inject obvious.
The higher yield and readiness according to me ? the work of the smoke limiter map(mg vs mbar ) that is sent to the wayside, because if I point to 50mg times deceived will be 55 or 60mg; and the duty of the n75 that the earth is open for 50mg instead of coming 60mg, and the turbo makes the peaks, and the car takes off, without necessarily smoke if you don't ? exaggerated the diesel deceived. Also the map pedal will work busted; requiring tot. mg, or NM, in reality will be more.
While with the informed as I happened already to begin with I had to raise a lot more in the map request in the pair(the pedal), and to have the same type of readiness of the other must be losing so much time, especially because the turbo goes into pressure less quickly if you have extended the axes of the diesel, then we will have a little more lag and less fuel, because the lim fumes ? map based, and if it reaches a certain pressure not inject immediately.

[SandroMarciano]

After some tests made on tdi edc16
the deceived as already imagine has a greater evil, that has more torque before the point of maximum torque.
For a quick edit, and that makes it, put it on the limiter, torque is the maximum value of the map conversion in NM, and then stretch the injections calcolandole for how much you want to inject obvious.
The higher yield and readiness according to me ? the work of the smoke limiter map(mg vs mbar ) that is sent to the wayside, because if I point to 50mg times deceived will be 55 or 60mg; and the duty of the n75 that the earth is open for 50mg instead of coming 60mg, and the turbo makes the peaks, and the car takes off, without necessarily smoke if you don't ? exaggerated the diesel deceived. Also the map pedal will work busted; requiring tot. mg, or NM, in reality will be more.
While with the informed as I happened already to begin with I had to raise a lot more in the map request in the pair(the pedal), and to have the same type of readiness of the other must be losing so much time, especially because the turbo goes into pressure less quickly if you have extended the axes of the diesel, then we will have a little more lag and less fuel, because the lim fumes ? map based, and if it reaches a certain pressure not inject immediately.

I also think like you, the moggior readiness ? due to those factors, in addition we'll put the maps of the VNT, which in terms of quickness? response of the turbo are the first to be called upon.

[cicciogsr]

I also think like you, the moggior readiness ? due to those factors, in addition we'll put the maps of the VNT, which in terms of quickness? response of the turbo are the first to be called upon.

from my tests I can only give the reason ? all a matter of timing of the turbo, adapting and without the optimal configuration of the vnt turbo does not reach the max pressure the most? quickly as possible..

[tidus1985]

and normal, having the map geometry 64mm3 the highest in the reality that iq iniettiamo much more fuel, then more smoke and at the same opening vgt the impeller takes a lot more speed.

You can get the same performance with the map-informed pact do review all the maps and geometry turbo and optimize them for having a spool fast and at the same time, a peak close to the maximum pressure required.
I help sandro at the time when the fault of the map, not informed I had peaks absurd pressure and I did not know how to solve.

Does anyone know where to take action and to run a maf off on the c39?
I thought, without excluding it would eliminate its control by putting the maps lamda to 0, even if it must, however, remain connected but would not be a problem

[cicciogsr]

the peaks they were with turbo ori? as dictated to you the goal?

[tidus1985]

Set prex request to 2400 mbar absolute, and I found myself peaks of 2.6 bar from the diagnosis, and almost 1.7 bar of boost from the pressure gauge, robba good a depo electronic stepper motor, then at the end part of the medical conditions he was given from too much fuel and in part from the vacuum reservoir, meaning that arranged the loss thanks to the board of sandro I lowered only the geometry of its BP 100mm3 that I warmed up by doing a linear proportion of the values of the map geometry from them pressure perfect

The peaks, however, I had them both with gt1749vm both with the gt1749v of 140cv, with the 2256 I had already? fixed all that

[munro]

I was wondering when you do? a topic similar to the edc16u.....