Hi guys,
I finally found the time to remove the dpf!!! in the afternoon caricher? the map attached in this post and then continue with the setup.
I still made a few tweaks here and compared to the previous one, in addition of course to luca stanca.
I pulled a straight line on the lambda-1, we see how it goes..
In the meantime if some expert wants to give it a look and give me some advice of course ? always welcome !
Last edited by msport (exil77grande); 01-10-2013 at 10:31
map tested! from diagnosis not find the problem 1000% on the dpf, I had brought to zero also the disable bit fap in addition to proceed with the deactivation with time, now we just hope you do not start regenerations ;-)
The car has a delivery much more? fluid, unfortunately it was raining a lot yesterday and have not yet been able to verify the presence of smoke so you can arrange the maps lambda.
159_step13_G.rar
Updated map
Drive tested with lambda-team 1, no smoke at a steady pace, slight smoked in the case of the sunk of the accelerator (in the norm I'd say).
Correct further maps lambda, light smoke on a cold and accelerated, the car is warm, light smoked in the case of sunk as with the lambda team.
By analyzing the graphs of the prex turbo you want, and the real well-known discrepancies that seem to me to be too discordant, now I am old log made with the map ori or prior to removing the dpf to make a comparison.
Some of you pi? expert could kindly give it a look and give me some suggestion about it? ? the case is wary of the vgt or not?
Grazieeeeeeegraph1.jpggraph2.jpg
guys any suggestion ???
For me the tip that I can give ? to change the mapping logic if you want to test the file that I'm posting I made by myself and see how it goes and how it seems to you also, by comparing it with the one yourOriginally Written by paolo159
Last edited by msport (exil77grande); 21-10-2013 at 09:05
PS: my request for an opinion was in reference to something else, I asked first for an opinion on the lambda and, in the second place, a council on the analysis of the graphs made from the diagnosis to understand if ? necessary to operate on the VGT.
;-)
Dear paul, I advise you to try the map I made for you and then maybe you see the difference between your and my I logic I can definitely give you a map that you buy with the money, and not in a map which I posted as an example only, and then think of it as you want
I don't think that goes quite agree with the ethics of this forum to post a map with no logic justifying it with the fact that the maps series pay.
If you do not want to share knowledge would be pi? should not post any map rather than send maps without logic.
Watch the right to take away the satisfaction prover? the map tomorrow and then I say to you, if you look closely at my map you will find that ? just a base map then ? its out of place to propose a base map and without logic...then if you want to detract from the guru of this forum that guided me step-by-step since the first day I put the hands on the control units do as well, my current map ? the result of so much experience and evidence, not mine since I'm not an expert but who has studied and invested time and money to improve.
Hello zagat1,
I would not want to seem rude, but I am of the opinion that the exchange of views should be constructive for all.
Then you tell me to change the logic why? according to you, it's not correct, I had a look at your map, which in my opinion (maybe wrong, I hope that msport, tidus, sandromarciano, and all other users of the pi? experts should take action to give their valuable advice) does not follow any logic.
I noticed that the maps pedal request 510 nm of torque, but the lim torque not ? appropriate, you have increased the time of inj without adapting the advances, have increased the prex rail speed is very low when in fact? not ? necessary, indeed ? completely counter-productive in view of the energy required to reach such a prex is at low rpm.
How can you tell me that your map has a correct logic and should be better than my?
Also I do not have the fap,no? the maps lambda the original should be just fine....
Write permission
Quote