Opinion the map 159 - 1.9 Mjet 150 hp

[paolo159]

Drive tested with lambda-team 1, no smoke at a steady pace, slight smoked in the case of the sunk of the accelerator (in the norm I'd say).
Correct further maps lambda, light smoke on a cold and accelerated, the car is warm, light smoked in the case of sunk as with the lambda team.

By analyzing the graphs of the prex turbo you want, and the real well-known discrepancies that seem to me to be too discordant, now I am old log made with the map ori or prior to removing the dpf to make a comparison.
Some of you pi? expert could kindly give it a look and give me some suggestion about it? ? the case is wary of the vgt or not?

Grazieeeeeeegraph1.jpggraph2.jpg

[paolo159]

159_step13_G.rar


Updated map

[paolo159]

guys any suggestion ???

[zaga1]

guys any suggestion ???

For me the tip that I can give ? to change the mapping logic if you want to test the file that I'm posting I made by myself and see how it goes and how it seems to you also, by comparing it with the one your

[paolo159]

Hello zagat1,
I would not want to seem rude, but I am of the opinion that the exchange of views should be constructive for all.
Then you tell me to change the logic why? according to you, it's not correct, I had a look at your map, which in my opinion (maybe wrong, I hope that msport, tidus, sandromarciano, and all other users of the pi? experts should take action to give their valuable advice) does not follow any logic.
I noticed that the maps pedal request 510 nm of torque, but the lim torque not ? appropriate, you have increased the time of inj without adapting the advances, have increased the prex rail speed is very low when in fact? not ? necessary, indeed ? completely counter-productive in view of the energy required to reach such a prex is at low rpm.
How can you tell me that your map has a correct logic and should be better than my?
Also I do not have the fap,no? the maps lambda the original should be just fine....

[paolo159]

PS: my request for an opinion was in reference to something else, I asked first for an opinion on the lambda and, in the second place, a council on the analysis of the graphs made from the diagnosis to understand if ? necessary to operate on the VGT.
;-)

[zaga1]

PS: my request for an opinion was in reference to something else, I asked first for an opinion on the lambda and, in the second place, a council on the analysis of the graphs made from the diagnosis to understand if ? necessary to operate on the VGT.
;-)

Dear paul, I advise you to try the map I made for you and then maybe you see the difference between your and my I logic I can definitely give you a map that you buy with the money, and not in a map which I posted as an example only, and then think of it as you want

[paolo159]

Dear paul, I advise you to try the map I made for you and then maybe you see the difference between your and my I logic I can definitely give you a map that you buy with the money, and not in a map which I posted as an example only, and then think of it as you want

I don't think that goes quite agree with the ethics of this forum to post a map with no logic justifying it with the fact that the maps series pay.
If you do not want to share knowledge would be pi? should not post any map rather than send maps without logic.

Watch the right to take away the satisfaction prover? the map tomorrow and then I say to you, if you look closely at my map you will find that ? just a base map then ? its out of place to propose a base map and without logic...then if you want to detract from the guru of this forum that guided me step-by-step since the first day I put the hands on the control units do as well, my current map ? the result of so much experience and evidence, not mine since I'm not an expert but who has studied and invested time and money to improve.

[zaga1]

I don't think that goes quite agree with the ethics of this forum to post a map with no logic justifying it with the fact that the maps series pay.
If you do not want to share knowledge would be pi? should not post any map rather than send maps without logic.

Watch the right to take away the satisfaction prover? the map tomorrow and then I say to you, if you look closely at my map you will find that ? just a base map then ? its out of place to propose a base map and without logic...then if you want to detract from the guru of this forum that guided me step-by-step since the first day I put the hands on the control units do as well, my current map ? the result of so much experience and evidence, not mine since I'm not an expert but who has studied and invested time and money to improve.

I have not demeaned anyone I'm just speaking in a discussion comparing a map made by me and I asked to try it then here you are talking of no other thing, and anyway I have made an example only in the sense of the map, in payment why? and rightly, a mapping is made for work that is paid requires more? loss of time in building it and so many things that maybe someone like others do not know that they are put................In short, I'm only trying to help you then think of it as you want and if not you should not to try to force.............

[paolo159]

look I don't like to make controversy, but if you give me to load a map without any logic in which the increments are given to you in the wrong way, instead of my made with a certain criterion, and a logic stratestata this means belittle the work of all those who have helped to make it happen.
Then the address of the pay-or-less does not hold his own, if I had posted a "base map", but with correct logic then I would have given a reason, I understand that you can't? some work and get to make calculations for a free week, but by your map I do understand that you have not the slightest idea what the logic.
I'm sorry if I'll attack you but I just want you to understand that it makes no sense what you're telling me, I really appreciate your good will? in the help me but will send me a map of the genre don't do that...there are 200 posts and 2 months of reasoning, calculations, and adjustments on this map in which many users have given their contribution to get to the point where I have arrived, now you come and say that the logic does not ? correct? and for pi? they send me a not c'? your own logic?

In addition, as a gi? that said, I made them specific questions on my map, I needed to have an opinion on the diagnosis and on the maps of lambda is not a new map.

On the fact of to give it a try to? surely in order to be able to say how it goes.