be the advance payments have been calculated taking into account 80 and 100mm3 to have an injection that lasts long after the pms as the injection of the original, you like avrsti amended advances and rail, then look carefully and you will notice that both advances that rail are rescaled up to 100mm3, while for the rail I increased up to 150bar more to 100mm3 the pressure to the midrange to have a smoke; hence a lower and an injection time more bereve so as not to give too much advance.
Continuous speech much do with a test just done, I lowered the geometry up to 20% with a coarse proportion by taking the values of the map from 20mm3 to 40mm3 60mm3 and facebdo so 80 and 100mm3, with a lowering of the geometry of the proportional, the map turbo set to 1.3 bar, so I guess I should climb slowly and then stop at 1.3 bar with a geometry so the cut does not ? so, of course, at 2200 rpm am full load is located 100mm3 pressure and still a 1.2 but rises without stopping up to 1.55 bar and then stand there and squat down a bit after 3500 rpm, this is not me back, because if the pressure target ? 1.3 bar, I get 1.55 from the diagnosis ? as absolute pressure is 1.48 bar, when I tell it to stop at 1.3, and the cutting of the net, the geometry of the 20%? I can't explain this thing, I made a map for a 147 with dpf, the same engine we did a test with the map-informed 92mm3 maximum injection and he did not have this problem of turbo pressure target 1.4 measured 1.424 maximum, my shoots, so also the geometry is very low, perhaps it will be for the lack of precatalizzatore that does not create pressures that hinder the running of the turbo, the hell with the original map the turbo comes to me at 1.4 with pressure gauge
Quote
Originally Written by SandroMarciano
