Sorry mport, damn t 9 of the mobile phone, to enable for example the dashboard to the messages of the cruise on the 159 is through the edf (Fiat ECU scan) realigning the proxy with the driver of the Fiat stilo 1.9, this is to say that certainly with the right input string should be able to enable this function
so from what you say, portemmo realign the dashboard, making believe to the diagnosis that is standing in front of a 147 DC, right?Originally Written by tidus1985
News today, I disassembled the whole electrical system the dashboard, well, the wire that is on and is referred to as a button sport on my normal restyling from the mass to the led's that light up the buttons of movement headlights and ASR to the RIGHT of the dashboard, so at this point I would say that it is the system that the body are physically different...
In collaboration with mariodarkblue we are experiencing the difference between a map "informed" this? with bp modified, and a map defrauded, i.e. with the change of the times, and the values of ancitipi and whatnot, but with bp engineering.
Therefore, the map informed is to have the following shortcomings:
-less torque in acceleration
-minor speed the response of the pedal
-consumption actually more real
-smoke; hence high exhaust
Tested both on my 147 120 hp jtdm on the bravo 150 hp of mario, we do not explain why, or some break point in fact do not work as a change type and those of the advances, or the cpu calculations more to do for the changes of the files that must be read, as are the origin for simplicity of the calculator ecu, I don't know, is the fact that a map-informed should go better, instead it's getting worse, to think that on my engine the map informed also delays the release of the accelerator pedal by to stay for a few milliseconds, the car accelerated, which is not the case with the normal mod of the times by changing the breakpoint
place 2 maps, so everyone can see them and try to understand where is the catch, if, indeed, c'?
the map is not informed only has bp amended on advances up to 80mm3 to give them accurate because the times are set to give 100mm3 of diesel precise 80mm3, of course, I redid the map pedal so as to never exceed the 350nm of torque alias 80mm3,
I agree on this result, in fact, the map deceived goes better on the road and it is for this reason that I have always claimed to not rely on only the theory but also the practice.
[IMG]http://bannerbreak*****/banners/3/563/135700419269659378.gif[/IMG]
I have not seen the map, but I am doing the same experiment, I got different results from your between map "informed" and "betrayed"( on the alfa 147 120cv1.9)... it Is perhaps the best response to the clamps of the pedal, the have with that deceived you, but smokes and consumes more... Everyone has their own way to map...
strange, for me instead ? l'?exact opposite, with the map informed smokes like a train, I've posted my example of map informed,s and s. you cjack I wanted to post the example of your map informed you, we'd be grateful so I can see any gaps or differences of one or the other
Quoto in toto tidus...proven deceived and informed...informed goes less and smokes like a train...deceived goes and smokes the met?...and I also did test consumption...consumption and less!
the nice thing now, would be to know why!
I had a map for the 535d is made abroad, given that I had this car and kids , there is not that touches the table"iniez zoned"..
of course, everything was to perfection..maybe the problems start when you begin to touch the bp and maybe c'? any inconsistency in which delays of deceleration and other...
this interesting thing...to iniez parzi. I think you mean the injection times..if it's so? it was...from where to pull him out of the diesel?As the map ? climb up to a certain IQ...to go further, or you calculate the time for IQ higher moddando the bp..or you only modify the values on the Z-axis, deceiving precisely the ecu...another way to bring out the diesel fuel does not ce n'?...
Write permission
Quote