Page 2 of 5 PrimaBefore 1234 ... LastUltima
Results 11 to 20 of 41

Discussion: Grande Punto mjet 90

  1. #11
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Jan 2013
    Messages
    238
    Post what you did...

  2. #12
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Feb 2013
    The resort
    Arezzo - Florence
    Messages
    961
    Citazione Originally Written by ion Visualizza Messaggio
    To be sure, but to stay anyway, within the limits of safety by avoiding maps "absurd" harmful for the entire machine, I believe that they are always better gains moderate.
    I am of the idea that a sports car ? a sports car, a Gp90mjet pu? be funny but not ? for nothing, you can make it the most? performance by ori ma ? absurd to want to push for more? performance. Then mancarebbero, among other things, the brakes and sospensinoi as not (assuming of changing as needed in the engine and transmission to make them hold) to which the expense would be very different, and you always get a GP "changed" and the structural limits of the intrinsic.
    Ergo a map that makes 130hp and 200 km/h (assuming this is possible) is not included in my will? for CHOICE.
    The final one that I would like to know ? how to have a map soft adequate and appropriate, without conceptual errors.
    Everything here !
    I don't approve of this philosophy, but I respect it, however, you had said that the problem was the smoke and the performance could go, well , the solution if you do not want to raise the boost pressure ? the lowering of the diesel fuel.

  3. #13
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Jun 2013
    Messages
    108
    Citazione Originally Written by SandroMarciano Visualizza Messaggio
    I don't approve of this philosophy, but I respect it, however, you had said that the problem was the smoke and the performance could go, well , the solution if you do not want to raise the boost pressure ? the lowering of the diesel fuel.
    Self-evident....

    I just wonder if the map from me "pumped" contains errors macroscopic such as to create smoke without make up equal measure performance (cmq light as said), that's all.
    Of course, with less fuel, pollutes less, already? seen with the mod "original" attached that smokes practically zero while having discrea yield to medium-low.
    I am attaching the driver from me is created, not ? perfect in some parameters, and even complete, if I do something wrong I ask the mod to remove it immediately !
    File Allegati File Attachments
    Last edited by msport (exil77grande); 09-07-2013 at 21:48

  4. #14
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Feb 2013
    The resort
    Arezzo - Florence
    Messages
    961
    I have now also seen the map, but ? very quiet, the problem, however, is the afr too low. I'd recommend you to increase the turbo pressure, here the most of the you have increased 56mbar, consider that up to 100mbar change ? still quiet.
    For each mod if you prefer to operate by reducing the diesel fuel, fix the angle at which you have arrived at the 15%, up to 10 and you'll see that the smoke disappears completely.
    I am attaching a screen to better see the map.

    Pressure turbocharger marelli mjet.jpg

  5. #15
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Jun 2013
    Messages
    108
    Citazione Originally Written by SandroMarciano Visualizza Messaggio
    I have now also seen the map, but ? very quiet, the problem, however, is the afr too low. I'd recommend you to increase the turbo pressure, here the most of the you have increased 56mbar, consider that up to 100mbar change ? still quiet.
    For each mod if you prefer to operate by reducing the diesel fuel, fix the angle at which you have arrived at the 15%, up to 10 and you'll see that the smoke disappears completely.
    I am attaching a screen to better see the map.

    Pressure turbocharger marelli mjet.jpg
    Thanks for the opinion and advice !
    Could you ada llegare a picture a little more? "big" ?
    This can see on the postage stamp size and I can't understand anything....

  6. #16
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Feb 2013
    The resort
    Arezzo - Florence
    Messages
    961
    let's see if I can cheat the system, try it now:
    File Allegati File Attachments
    Last edited by msport (exil77grande); 09-07-2013 at 21:51

  7. #17
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Jun 2013
    Messages
    108
    Citazione Originally Written by SandroMarciano Visualizza Messaggio
    let's see if I can cheat the system, try it now:
    Pressure turbocharger marelli mjet.zip
    Perfect, thanks.
    I have just a moment, the comparison with the "my" the map !

  8. #18
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Feb 2013
    The resort
    Arezzo - Florence
    Messages
    961
    Citazione Originally Written by ion Visualizza Messaggio
    Perfect, thanks.
    I have just a moment, the comparison with the "my" the map !
    that ? your map, only showing the pressure values in mbar

  9. #19
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Jun 2013
    Messages
    108
    Citazione Originally Written by SandroMarciano Visualizza Messaggio
    that ? your map, only showing the pressure values in mbar
    Ok, I thought it was the map ORI, I have not yet compared the screen with the data, thanks.
    However, the values are relatively low, and a bit of edge c'? still...

  10. #20
    THE AVERAGE USER
    Date Of Registration
    Feb 2013
    The resort
    Arezzo - Florence
    Messages
    961
    Citazione Originally Written by ion Visualizza Messaggio
    Ok, I thought it was the map ORI, I have not yet compared the screen with the data, thanks.
    However, the values are relatively low, and a bit of edge c'? still...
    it is, in my opinion, c'? still the margin, then maybe if someone else says its...

Page 2 of 5 PrimaBefore 1234 ... LastUltima

Write permission

  • You you can not post new threads
  • You you can not send answers
  • You you can not send attachments
  • You you can not edit your posts
  •