can you please post the link.. forum... where to speak of the change....
http://www.professionalchiptuning.ne...ll=1#post45958
it is the first message that is read.!!
can you please post the link.. forum... where to speak of the change....
http://www.professionalchiptuning.ne...ll=1#post45958
it is the first message that is read.!!
No worry of clogging a a thousand% do not ? what creates problems.
In fact, gia. To correct bringing the gold a bit but doesn't compromise anything to keep it at 1000. Now I am curious to try it with the off switch instead of the file ecusafe. To match all exclusion swirl. Question the bit dpf and the sensor off ? in 8-bit?
*already..
we are talking about everyone else...
* oakley...
make 16-bit motorola...!! you have to do dpf off and lamba off.. then check in diagnosis if you mark the installation without dpf and without lambda..
I also deleted the swirl... both physically.. that map..!!
oakley... you will really feel a big difference with the swich off..
for the swirl... I disassembled personally the intake manifold.. to see how it was put.. the car lho outlet used... and has done 100,000 km with active dpf and egr active..
so much so that I was there, I deleted...
here some photos... of the swirl.. before and after..
91240010.jpg96152610.jpg91183510.jpg91191110.jpg
As I already said in the other discussion, I tried the file defappato both ecusafe, both from a time and switch off.
Between 3 no difference prestazionalmente and they all work well. The only difference with the swich off complete the luca stanca removing from diagnosis all the entries are related to the dpf (post injections, oil degradation, forced regenerations, etc... etc......).
An other thing. As has already tried a friend of the forum the only swich off without defappare the file does not work. If you try to give us confirmation.
Finally, read the bit 8-bir
have you considered doing the switch-off passed by limiters smoke lambda-based to maf based? the performance difference can? be attributed also to this thing!