I did not want to offend anyone I just asked what do you think was better I want the monomassa but I wanted more? info without doing the inca... None
I did not want to offend anyone I just asked what do you think was better I want the monomassa but I wanted more? info without doing the inca... None
and who is inc... for the cos? little....Originally Written by alfone85
the flywheel of the original v? pi? that's good... ? designed to hold up to 450nm
put only a beautiful clutch.... why? ? the part that sins...
I and my cavalry I'll go out without problems with the original flywheel and vibration, but with the clutch not the original...
if not, if you eat it in 20,000 km if evil wizard...
keep the torque values indicated in nm does not mean to have them useful to dispense, cavort with a few nm in the ir? let alone with preparations decided...and here not ? the question of how to lead and its care why? if one wants to throw down? l throttle to 1000 rpm and hold it down? up to 5500 rpm in each gear, the group flywheel-clutch should not have any hesitation or malfunction...there are rarely flywheels that do not vibrate with changes strong but they last very little, the emission standard has affected, in addition to the flywheel, clutch, brakes, and other bodies that withstand mechanical stress-thermal strong
that saltellino with a few NM in the ir? ? difficult.. if we are talking about having 500NM to 2000 rpm and then s that?...
but then it also raises the issue to the other mechanical components... then v? revised all...
quietly the 450NM keeps them at 2000 rpm... this is s? therefore, if one wants to have more?
why? want a change strong you have to make a preparation for pi? serious that affects both flywheel and clutch...
the exchange also he durer? on the basis of the output torque and the cycle of fatigue for which ? designed.
Good or evil are beautiful exchange...
For? ? clear that the vehicle has a TOTAL potential...
to go beyond ? better to change vehicle...
insommma those who are satisfied enjoys it....
Well, you're right, I can't afford to write that you speak from hearsay, and not insister?, but I invited you to explain how does the flywheel (dual mass), but you didn't did you, l? we are keeping the math...
we'll talk about it when you know what is st? talking about... without assert sentences that made no sense.
you're going very OFF-TOPIC
ok I stop here all the discussion, both those who read this? understand?...
Hello...so, watch me on the c530.6 I pulled out 400nm of torque and not broken anything...with original clutch and bimassa original..obviously you have accortenza in the guide....I can tell you as a gi? you have said that the frictions CO.ME are excellent!If you want to stay quiet and move up torque and power, you can find a flywheel fixed group fiat Lancia K, coup? t20), and you do its reinforced clutch with pressure plate reinforced by CO.Me...to change broken with monomassa even I never seen...I can tell you, x? on my stylus jtd115 processed, I was riding with 210cv, 45kg pair with original flywheel and clutch co.me...never no slippage...also under stress on the track...of course if I WANTED to, the flywheel did tremble
guys, I also have the nasona, and I mount the clutch as monomassa.... honestly more than a little bit of jiggle, I do not have any other problem....
a question I want to do.... talk to 220 hp.... with what you have them pulled out?? with the car fully ori???
I have on several robina.... turbo gtb2056, exhaust manifolds, exhaust completely ******, injectors changed, the clutch co.me, filter sports.... but honestly I don't know if we have arrived to this cavalry.... who ? so kind to give me a hand to pull them off?? :P
Watch I turbine uprated intercooler and a good map of all the steel tubes and the direct discharge filter bmc
Write permission
Quote