I also thought I to what you said.... my idea was to copy the maps in the engine management from 210cv... then, surely, given that to me is missing a cylinder... the pressure theoretically ? more low.... at that point... start to raise slowly, by 5% on all the maps of the management turbo... and then I aiutero' with log based on rpm, pedal, prex, turbo, and proportion valve... for example.... if I see that absurd... 2800 rpm with a load of 80%, a percentage of valve 70% of the pressure spike, in an overboost to 2 bar, for example, wear' l' opening of the valve in the 60% to lower this phenomenon to that number of turns....
theoretically no if I remember correctly... the more the percentage ? high and the blades are closed... that is, in the charge phase, the more the blades are open (betting towards the impeller) then percentage type to 30% and more and be in a position of stable pressure, right??
I was jokingindeed, I would like to thank you for all this info that we're giving... all these things, you know, to work or just for passion?
what you say you're right.... but what do you do you ****llo mechanical??? if I have a problem like you described.... original, pike high, corrects and lowers, then revenge, then corrects, and then lowers..... if this is the case.... and the fix only mechanically.... I would have a lag at low revs, then starts to climb... and pulls up top.... if instead, I go to tap the map of the turbo.... I don't know if you've noticed.... to the midrange on the management of 2400 falls again, the percentage of valve type at 60% instead of 70/75% in order to lower the pressure in those ****lli.... you say that logic is wrong??? these controls that you say.... how do you understand them and where are they located??