Remapping, performance or consumption
Hearing about the programming of ecus, mi ? happened to pi? times of hearing that, according to the requests of the client, you can create mappings to give priority to the power increase or the reduction of energy consumption.
I never figured out if this ? an urban legend or if there are actually two completely different ways to change the ecu.
Someone can? give me explanations and possibly confirmations on this?
Thanks!
Originally Written by bart
Hearing about the programming of ecus, mi ? happened to pi? times of hearing that, according to the requests of the client, you can create mappings to give priority to the power increase or the reduction of energy consumption.
I never figured out if this ? an urban legend or if there are actually two completely different ways to change the ecu.
Someone can? give me explanations and possibly confirmations on this?
Thanks!
well let's just say that ottimizando the parameters in a targeted manner you can create a map, soft and at the same pace as compared to the original configuration would definitely have a drop in consumption, apart from a provision more pleasant,instead, in the case of a request by the customer of a mapping more powerful certainly will not preserve any consumption but have consistently superior performance and drive much more aggressive in all situations,it is only to change the map according to what you want to achieve.
[IMG]http://bannerbreak*****/banners/3/563/135700419269659378.gif[/IMG]
But then, you could make a map mixed? For example, the map performance when you are traveling at full load and soft in the other conditions?
From what we hear, it seems instead that the coexistence of the two situations it is not possible to... Is it really cos
In my opinion, I could even say a joke, the fuel savings you have in the acceleration time, let me explain,
if a car is the original, and 100% engine load takes 10 sec and 1000 meters to reach 100 km/h consumes hypothesis-10cl of fuel,while a car rimapata with the same load takes 8 sec and 800 meters, with a consumption of 12cl
This means that if you drive into the street where, either for traffic or for the limits of speed? or else, you go at the same speed? both with a car golds that mapped, but with a mapped you would need less time and less meters to get to the same speed? then alzereste before your foot from the accelerator, with a consequent saving of fuel, multiply that by the number of times you have to reach your speed? and there risulter? with the car mapped you will have fuel savings,
this for? only takes place at equal speed, logical that if you increase the speed? and from there, the acceleration times you will have a higher consumption.
For example, while one traffic light to another, there are 1000m, and you will reach 100km/h with a original consumereste 10cl, but with a mapped consumereste of pi? for the first 800m, but the remaining 200 you would make them with a motor load is very low why? you would have gi? reached 100km/h with the result that in the equal way on your machine avr? consumed 8cl.
I hope to be able to make the idea
but even with the map soft when you push on the accelerator, the fuel consumption will always be higher than the original??or no??
of course, but also from the original if it stresses the machine consumes more or no?
you may not have the barrel full and the wife drunk.
[IMG]http://bannerbreak*****/banners/3/563/135700419269659378.gif[/IMG]
but then the story with a mapping of the consumption decrease is not ? true 100%
and of course it always depends on who's driving the car to know how to manage it with the foot, but if one, like me, that c'? the heavy
a remap will not improve things indeed.
in principle, if not crushing it has a slight savings. Certain ? that, a priori, the car should not smoke, the black smoke ? diesel fuel unburned, then gi? what ? symptom of consumption is high according to me!
To me have explained cos?, take it with pliers:
"To do 100Km/h with the car in Stock, we want to -but not limited to (random numbers)- the 20% loading on the gas while the car remapped, to do the same speed? it takes you 15% of load on the gas, so with the 20% loading on the gas and drive properly remapped, you'll do 105Km/h. Equal load float pi? road why? do a speed? greater than or at the same speed?, it takes less gas to travel the same road, so less diesel!
The ragioanmento me ? seemed correct, even if they have not been considered in the enormit? of parameters, and variables, to find a map or in the same path! It is very ideal as a concept but according to me makes the idea.
What you are saying, do you ? exactly what I always thought too! The Cio?: if the same car has more? power, then in order to have the same performance in the same conditions, sar? need to insist less on the accelerator pedal, so less load = less fuel consumption.
This? according to me, exactly when it happens on some cars is mounted on is a motor "undersized", this consumes significantly more? of the same model with an engine of larger displacement and more power...
Write permission
Quote