Remapping, performance or consumption

[bart]

Hearing about the programming of ecus, mi ? happened to pi? times of hearing that, according to the requests of the client, you can create mappings to give priority to the power increase or the reduction of energy consumption.
I never figured out if this ? an urban legend or if there are actually two completely different ways to change the ecu.
Someone can? give me explanations and possibly confirmations on this?
Thanks!

[msport (exil77grande)]

Hearing about the programming of ecus, mi ? happened to pi? times of hearing that, according to the requests of the client, you can create mappings to give priority to the power increase or the reduction of energy consumption.
I never figured out if this ? an urban legend or if there are actually two completely different ways to change the ecu.
Someone can? give me explanations and possibly confirmations on this?
Thanks!

well let's just say that ottimizando the parameters in a targeted manner you can create a map, soft and at the same pace as compared to the original configuration would definitely have a drop in consumption, apart from a provision more pleasant,instead, in the case of a request by the customer of a mapping more powerful certainly will not preserve any consumption but have consistently superior performance and drive much more aggressive in all situations,it is only to change the map according to what you want to achieve.

[mcjtd]

but even with the map soft when you push on the accelerator, the fuel consumption will always be higher than the original??or no??

[msport (exil77grande)]

but even with the map soft when you push on the accelerator, the fuel consumption will always be higher than the original??or no??

of course, but also from the original if it stresses the machine consumes more or no?
you may not have the barrel full and the wife drunk.

[mcjtd]

but then the story with a mapping of the consumption decrease is not ? true 100%
and of course it always depends on who's driving the car to know how to manage it with the foot, but if one, like me, that c'? the heavy
a remap will not improve things indeed.

[magi1984]

in principle, if not crushing it has a slight savings. Certain ? that, a priori, the car should not smoke, the black smoke ? diesel fuel unburned, then gi? what ? symptom of consumption is high according to me!

[V.V.]

To me have explained cos?, take it with pliers:

"To do 100Km/h with the car in Stock, we want to -but not limited to (random numbers)- the 20% loading on the gas while the car remapped, to do the same speed? it takes you 15% of load on the gas, so with the 20% loading on the gas and drive properly remapped, you'll do 105Km/h. Equal load float pi? road why? do a speed? greater than or at the same speed?, it takes less gas to travel the same road, so less diesel!

The ragioanmento me ? seemed correct, even if they have not been considered in the enormit? of parameters, and variables, to find a map or in the same path! It is very ideal as a concept but according to me makes the idea.

[mcjtd]

I don't think you reduce everything to a question of "load" also, if a given relationship to those laps and with those horses are tot km-h invariando all the factors, relationships, and the engine rpm because with more hp should do more km-h? and at the same time consume less?
I'll explain better if in the fifth to 2000 rpm I do 140km-h with 150 hp
what will change if I have 180 hp always at 2000 rpm? fifth, always 140km-h to??
not ? that is the speed? you create from nothing, then, to equal the speed and rpm but with piucavalli how does the motor consume less??spiegatemelo please because I don't get it

[V.V.]

Eh, in effect, you've made me reflect on one thing, the speed? of the exchange are the same as those, then all my reasoning goes by the wayside; For? pu? perhaps, following the line of logic that I have given, that in parit? load reaches a pi? easily a speed? higher than that of a car stock! What I wonder ?: to obtain this result, not ? still need a quantity of fuel greater? Perhaps the reduction in fuel consumption is achieved because? through a good map, it improves the volumetric efficiency and combustion.

[bart]

well let's just say that ottimizando the parameters in a targeted manner you can create a map, soft and at the same pace as compared to the original configuration would definitely have a drop in consumption, apart from a provision more pleasant,instead, in the case of a request by the customer of a mapping more powerful certainly will not preserve any consumption but have consistently superior performance and drive much more aggressive in all situations,it is only to change the map according to what you want to achieve.

But then, you could make a map mixed? For example, the map performance when you are traveling at full load and soft in the other conditions?
From what we hear, it seems instead that the coexistence of the two situations it is not possible to... Is it really cos