opinion map mod alfa 147 1.9 150 hp 533_727

[simone82]

sorry I mean the ecm 16.1

[zioweb]

I agree with msport on the address to put in the ori: a if " no " as the scans??

for the discussion of the golds of the preparer on-line... well to me bother... irrespective of the expense/gain ... one you hit to study, learn and put in place something that then cos? a "funny" someone can? to take and reuse it, or criticize it to his liking, perhaps without even having the grounds to do so... what is ethically pi? right ? that if you post a MOD this should be YOUR second me.

[msport (exil77grande)]

sorry I mean the ecm 16.1

currently, 1.61 put at the disposal only of older users and sorry, but as I already said I don't want users who attend only to the deadbolt,with this don't get me wrong there' with nobody but you are all fesci still,we slowly way to get to know us better,currently there is 1.49 available with the on the bug in the ck and various things, but that's okay, too, but you have to reach the 100 messages and then apply for the pass.

[simone82]

ah I got it,but also the original files?I 16.1 l I gi? but some drivers fail me just for that

[dvdtuning]

Rightly if you mail a map to a user's stated and are commented by other people well established not can? that to be a positive comment...with regard to the speech logic increase each of them has its then pu? like it or not, but if it is done wrong ? made bad (according to me).
Anyway, I posted a mod for an opinion, and give in to "insulting" constructive!

[simone82]

even if, for now, in the forums, but I have yet to find a person from a positive opinion

[msport (exil77grande)]

ah I got it,but also the original files?I 16.1 l I gi? but some drivers fail me just for that

and' the 1.61 non-16.1 and, unfortunately, it is not like the old ecm that you could pass the driver here or you have them or anything.

[simone82]

ah ok understood

[giarras]

x dvdtuning do not fear the comparison with anyone and I have shown just the other day by sending my map, albeit based on a user free of charge,I know all too well, and I have written at other times, that almost all of them have different methods, albeit a base there must be,but the thing that gives me a lot of hassle and:
1) my work is posted from a beginner to this point proves to have doubts on my work.
2) my work is posted on other forums where scacalli not want to criticize the work of others to get interesting when then do not even know how to exclude an egr,so they eloggiano and completely the authors of the maps are trashed when perhaps it is not so.

I found a long time ago on a forum where any file posted was always commented in the negative,then I started to take a look at these files, which often frightening but not all of them were to throw and you could try it without problems.
I think of myself as a professional and humble and accept any advice for me,a remap is done well and I finished working when the customer test the car and tells me perfect goes well,does not smoke and pushes as I wanted,but if the customer says yes, but I smoke a little then I correct myself,but I would like more torque then I correct myself,but I would like more powerful then I correct myself, etc etc etc I don't stop in 1 step, but I will stop where I lead the customer is obvious that I can't do 100 step but just enough,and then when I finished the work I see no reason why it should be posted,to you the word.

I fully agree with your say.

[magi1984]

and I am the living example of what it says msport.
my car has given me good advice, and showing a lot of seriet? and availability?
while in another forum,for every test done on my car, I was only "comments mxxxa"
and when I did this that here I was helped while the mi han solo "teased,"as a response, I've been banned

alive professionalchiptuning.net and the admin of the

sorry for the OT