on other ecu's are separate for the pre/post injections.. just try to lower one at a time, you understand which to use when.. if you do not notice the differences probably won't use it xD
on other ecu's are separate for the pre/post injections.. just try to lower one at a time, you understand which to use when.. if you do not notice the differences probably won't use it xD
Cabbage, but if they were pre-or post-injections, and not the main, should not be changed, in order not to cause irregularities in the engine..Originally Written by lsdlsd88
I know it always touches only the main injection
( my, 90 hp, strattona 5 and 6 from 1800 to 2400, in the other marcie no, probably when there is more demand of the pair)
for the percentages that you can give usually, do not change too much', what you want it to be 10% on a preiniezione of 1mg...
I am of the idea that they do not get their OWN touch on the times on ste the ecu in any way. have already been calculated for 65mm..
Already, this is also true, I was just trying to understand why I strattona 5 and 6 at around 2000 rpm..
how to lift the fuel if it does not touch the times? with the rail pressure? to low you can do a lot of pressure, so the bass does not reach the highest peaks.as you pick up , say , 2000 giti will you get max to 1000mmbar. or map the pedal?
ask yourself based on which map the ecu decides how much fuel inettare for example, with the pedal 100% to 2000 rpm.
for the jerk, you must take the log, see quatità diesel/fuel rail/turbo as vary..
on the map the pedal, the one that the ecm is calling me an injection f temp air, 2 maps with the individual curves read to the contrary, and parternza in the negative, each curve corresponds to the % load, the various points are required to torque to a certain rpm..but there is no iq
in the map pressure there is iq , but there is no pedal..
in which map there is iq and the pedal??
I can not cross them..the one pedal I request to pair, and then where I'm going to see to switch from torque to iq?
thanks
torque and iq are converted linearly, but this is not the point. the point is that you request (example!) 250 Nm from the pedal, and you have a certain iq (if you do the math you'll see that there are about 5 Nm each of the mm3, though it varies a little with the rpm..).
then ask to 290, and you find the same identical iq of the first in the log (and thus the same performance).
where they lost those 50 Nm?
Interesting , the same iq, because it is not passed to the upper curve of IQ? we would like more curves of IQ to have an operation more homogeneous...tantè that my pedal throttle for a good stretch does nothing..let me explain; the first piece, then since more than half no longer does anything, in the sense that it does not change..
it is possible that at 1900 rpm, with the pedal to 25% of the time I still request the negative torque? right where I strattona more!! maybe ori was, but by changing the rest and also here it is to be raised? can be?
thanks
Offset -100 bar
Write permission
Quote
