Turbo Alfa 159 150 HP vs 210CV

[jared_poe]

ok I think I understand that for now I don't need... however, if in the map, keep on the values of 2600/2700 mBar do not run the risk of doing damage (st? speaking of Alfa 159 150 HP)

[jared_poe]

are you talking about the original turbine

[jared_poe]

then, according to you ? better to leave the limiters to no more than 2600mBar to avoid the risk of damaging the turbine

[jared_poe]

ok I understand what you mean for? I wanting to always stay on the side of the handle I am on the threshold l? I avoid damages

[rego88]

I'm doing this crazy edit.... I'm putting the turbo 210cv on the 147 150 hp.... ? a bell' ammattimento submit all.... that's why? I want to delete the air mass meter....

[jared_poe]

would like to just let you know that a Turbo with variable geometry has its "achilles heel" in the vanes of the latter which will not withstand very high temperatures for long periods of time...
hypothetically, a vgt you might break even without increasing the press of work, but for the absurd due to an increase in temperature egt derived for a catalyst means clogged or long bursts without leave to cool down the turbo itself...

munro you're starting to scare me...do so? could you help me to make the map turbo?

[jared_poe]

I was joking indeed, I would like to thank you for all this info that we're giving... all these things, you know, to work or just for passion?

[rego88]

hehe... good rego cos? you f?.....I just wanted to warn for? that probably made after the change you will have some problems with the management of the geometry, nothing too serious, only that it will not be? veeery stable as the ori cio? give a big peak then caler? much to a certain number of laps and then again, piccare and nuvamente towards the end of the rpm returns to decrease as pressure...in short, contrary to the ori a, the pressure p? ups and downs...nothing that can't be solved with a good map...especially working on the maps an overboost.....

I had heard that it was not easy to manage the geometry on this turbine...if you are talking about so I think that a mod you have already made..... in egffetti I knew I had to play with the maps of the geometry.... thing that up until now I have never done.... I don't understand a thing.... x which is why it behaves like you said?? xk? climbs, then descends again then it goes back and then comes down again??? I could take reference from the maps of the geometry of a brera 210cv??

[msport (exil77grande)]

I had heard that it was not easy to manage the geometry on this turbine...if you are talking about so I think that a mod you have already made..... in egffetti I knew I had to play with the maps of the geometry.... thing that up until now I have never done.... I don't understand a thing.... x which is why it behaves like you said?? xk? climbs, then descends again then it goes back and then comes down again??? I could take reference from the maps of the geometry of a brera 210cv??

definitely closely studying the maps of the turbo 210cv something comes out.

[rego88]

I also thought I to what you said.... my idea was to copy the maps in the engine management from 210cv... then, surely, given that to me is missing a cylinder... the pressure theoretically ? more low.... at that point... start to raise slowly, by 5% on all the maps of the management turbo... and then I aiutero' with log based on rpm, pedal, prex, turbo, and proportion valve... for example.... if I see that absurd... 2800 rpm with a load of 80%, a percentage of valve 70% of the pressure spike, in an overboost to 2 bar, for example, wear' l' opening of the valve in the 60% to lower this phenomenon to that number of turns....
theoretically no if I remember correctly... the more the percentage ? high and the blades are closed... that is, in the charge phase, the more the blades are open (betting towards the impeller) then percentage type to 30% and more and be in a position of stable pressure, right??