Opinion the map Alfa Gt MJET

[GPoint]

do you have a map and not a single life adjustment, just lower it where you see the piccate

The fact ome I have suggested, otherwise I think you're right, we step the life to adjust and try. Now in the peak arrives at 1.6 Bar and still shooting works on 1.50\1,55 Bar. In a couple of values was slightly higher, but the type that came in 1,62 maximum.

The only thing that leaves me a p? puzzled ? a little noise that I hear when I pass the 3000 rpm in higher gears 5 and 6, as if there was a "meow", does not look like a metallic noise, but more? type "gnnnnnn", it seems to me that you are present when the rail pressure reaches the maximum value, but I do not know if ? that is the cause.

I look like an idiot who makes the noises with your mouth.

[GPoint]

I did more testing and I know that perhaps I have only fixed a p? unnecessarily on the background noise that surely made gi? first. In the pi? when I put the flywheel monomassa the machine ? pi? noisy and having really little time no avr? the fact still in the habit. However, the definitive map with the vgt changed ? this:
Thank you all once again and for any criticism are available.

[franco75]

For me ? great, just wanting to dig in the ass of the cicada:
1. a "finished" the torque limiter that has the maximum value at 3500 rpm,
2. there seems to be another map rail, but maybe not ? in use, when in doubt the will
3. I would have kept a little more broad with limiters rail
4. the map vgt should be a percrntuale, if the decrease of 10% in reality? you have decreased the map a lot less.
example: you've gone from 47% to 42%, then you have decreased the value of the 10% but in reality, you have reduced the rate of 5%
likely to be enough, I don't have the experience to answer you.


can I ask you a question I, the map 1E79c6 ? the map of the swirl?

[GPoint]

For me ? great, just wanting to dig in the ass of the cicada:
1. a "finished" the torque limiter that has the maximum value at 3500 rpm,
2. there seems to be another map rail, but maybe not ? in use, when in doubt the will
3. I would have kept a little more broad with limiters rail
4. the map vgt should be a percrntuale, if the decrease of 10% in reality? you have decreased the map a lot less.
example: you've gone from 47% to 42%, then you have decreased the value of the 10% but in reality, you have reduced the rate of 5%
likely to be enough, I don't have the experience to answer you.


can I ask you a question I, the map 1E79c6 ? the map of the swirl?

Hello franco, thanks for the tips. The torque limiter I held a p? pi? below the 3000 why? with monomassa I had some vibration at 2200\2500 rpm in the higher gears. Maybe I could anticipate a p? the torque limiter as you told me and use those of the individual gears only to limit in the fifth and sixth as I had suggested in another discussion, but in this map I made.
For the rail I had made a log when it was about 65 bar in the pi? and limiter at 75 bar, almost always arrived in 1675 bar, then given that in the original map ? 1600 max with limiters to 1600, I have adopted that philosophy. For now it has not given me damage which is strange, if it was that something is up, the hair, the limiter.
For the vgt I got not to raise the pressure more than 1.6 bar so I guess that will be running? for a p? in these conditions, perhaps by monitoring with mes for periods of a p? pi? long just to be sure that not to exceed.

The address that you wrote it you nailed it in full, following the directions of another discussion I think I have them excluded. However, a couple of months ago I removed the led and the I removed physically from the intake manifold, I don't know if excluding them also electronically change something for the purpose of the engine management or simply leave the electric motor in terms of always open.

PS "dig in the ass of the cicala" never heard this said, I'm still laughing

[GPoint]

I did some additional editing that I had not yet tried. I changed the phase to inj in excess of 70 over 3000Rpm. I don't know if it actually is correct or if it is better to change the whole column, and then also to rev more? low.

[GPoint]

UPDATE

Time after time I've tried to redo the map trying to follow the logic informed. I have basically modified the BP and scaled the values in the table of maps, Turbo, VGT, INJ, RAIL and STAGE. The doubt in the pi? great ? on the map of the phase where I deleted a BP and replace it with the next climbing also the values in the table. The original had the same values for BP in the 60's and 70 Inj, then having them replaced with 80 and 100 of them have increased, respectively, 0.5 and 1 degree. Every criticism ? well accept.

883.726 TEST6.zip

[pasquale]

hello Gpoint I read the whole thread...really interesting (since I have the Gt but with edc16c8) and I would say that it would be nice to see a roll!!

[GPoint]

hello Gpoint I read the whole thread...really interesting (since I have the Gt but with edc16c8) and I would say that it would be nice to see a roll!!

Hello Pasquale, to be honest, I've never tried to get it rolling, I'd like to but I don't know anyone. Also for clutch problems, I gave a nice scaled to the map, pi? what else in the bottom. I removed the monomassa to problems of comfort and with the clutch and flywheel new I have done some further editing to inject about 90, and honestly, I liked how it went for? our cars have the clutch that I don't ? of the best, and also after a few miles began to feel the effect of the cv, so I am limited to 80 as the maximum threshold. It would have to be replaced with something more? durable to ask for something more?.

[pasquale]

According to me, you did a great thing to remove the monomassa (the tractors leave them to farmers). For the problem clutch just put a reinforced (no florentine ? ....too) and tries to provide a torque delivery as pi? possible linear up to 2000g/m, you will see that you will not have problems.
For the speech rolled serves not only to be cool with friends, but also to understand how to optimize the delivery.

p.s. you have removed the prekat(at least) true? If I were you, too everything except the silencer, in this way, take a nice p? of back pressure flushing slightly at the bottom (the critical area for the clutch) and redo the vgt (why? the turbo would rise, too). For the review, don't worry, just do it with the engine up to temperature and if the rapp stechio ? almost? right (why? with the diesel ? impossible to do it right) steps up to 100%.

[GPoint]

According to me, you did a great thing to remove the monomassa (the tractors leave them to farmers). For the problem clutch just put a reinforced (no florentine ? ....too) and tries to provide a torque delivery as pi? possible linear up to 2000g/m, you will see that you will not have problems.
For the speech rolled serves not only to be cool with friends, but also to understand how to optimize the delivery.

p.s. you have removed the prekat(at least) true? If I were you, too everything except the silencer, in this way, take a nice p? of back pressure flushing slightly at the bottom (the critical area for the clutch) and redo the vgt (why? the turbo would rise, too). For the review, don't worry, just do it with the engine up to temperature and if the rapp stechio ? almost? right (why? with the diesel ? impossible to do it right) steps up to 100%.

Prekat, swirl, not c'? pi? nothing. The catalyst in the center of the leave for reasons of yield in the bottom, just as you said, I prefer to work on the torque limiter to reduce the load on the clutch. However, now the ? less brutal than the first, but runs well, however, and makes. Let's say that I am satisfied and would prefer to reach a compromise.