opinion the map opel corsa 1.3 70 HP

[dariuccio]

try to moddare and does not change anything, not even the fumosit?, for me, they are 068006 something like turbo pressure goal (the recovery ? place to 1.78) and
068266 something related to the air mass sucked in function of the prex

[Errecinque]

I agree with R5, (a little OT r have you ever thought of leaving Renault to switch to yamaha? cos? passeresti from R5 to R6 or R1 hahaha joke of course ) for me are the lambda...

Continuous and close OT : The

[Errecinque]

The egr R5 continues to rest in the garage.....from road bikes from enduro...is coming to the new BETA 250 FACTORY after 5 KTM. W ITALY

[Ela.Toretto]

Ahahaha ok ok Dariuccio but the maps lambda as you moddate? incremented or decremented? why? I decrementandole ( down 3%) I feel a rise of fumosit?... you need to do the log and data to hand to draw the right conclusions

[Exelion1986]

the maps 68006 and 68266 should be up to the lambda
in theory, that important ? the second (which is referred to as lambda for high iq)
in x we have the mass air intake in mg, y, tours, and z, with a conversion factor 0,001302 we have the air/fuel ratio
if we want to increase the diesel fuel, the value of z should be decreased
I have not yet tried to touch these, as soon as my friend who makes me be a guinea pig have time I'll also try with a diagnosis

[dariuccio]

the map 68226 taking the higher value of the z-axis, we have, in 1781, which, when multiplied by 0,001302 ago 2,31, to me it appears to be nothing an afr.
what? the conversion factor of the mass air flow (1781)? it seems to me a turbo pressure. could be maps of the voltage of the map and maf?
but how could you convert the values of the z-axis?
Toretto map lambda would like to say that immediately after the maps from the pedal? I have given up to a 15% and 20% to the high, and the smoke ? acceptable but still not
I've understood well

[Ela.Toretto]

the maps 68006 and 68266 should be up to the lambda
in theory, that important ? the second (which is referred to as lambda for high iq)
in x we have the mass air intake in mg, y, tours, and z, with a conversion factor 0,001302 we have the air/fuel ratio
if we want to increase the diesel fuel, the value of z should be decreased
I have not yet tried to touch these, as soon as my friend who makes me be a guinea pig have time I'll also try with a diagnosis

Quoto full I as I said pi? I decreased these maps of 3% (I did a driver winols ad hoc, and I decremented only the areas with the lowest value, i.e. the high loads) and I repeat the fumosit? ? increased (ps I have a gp 75 ) as soon as I have a minute I connect the elm, and I make a log before and after the change of these maps

[Ela.Toretto]

the map 68226 taking the higher value of the z-axis, we have, in 1781, which, when multiplied by 0,001302 ago 2,31, to me it appears to be nothing an afr.
what? the conversion factor of the mass air flow (1781)? it seems to me a turbo pressure. could be maps of the voltage of the map and maf?
but how could you convert the values of the z-axis?
Toretto map lambda would like to say that immediately after the maps from the pedal? I have given up to a 15% and 20% to the high, and the smoke ? acceptable but still not
I've understood well

No Dariuccio I am not referring to the torque limiter in f. the temp. of the liquid (the one immediately after the pedal, that ahim? even I have well understood how to work, how much ? as a function of temperature "strange"? as I said pi? on to me ? a map is essential to give more? diesel without necessarily getting to the injection time).... but the maps that you're talking about (68006 and 68226 ),

[dariuccio]

you look at these maps on file of a point 70cv? the curves from the side of the break have higher values

[Ela.Toretto]

yes, I noticed but in marelli, if they were to rebus instead of the control units made of money... I do not know why this difference.. the only hypothesis that I is ? that being devoid of the lambda probe is ref? to some other parameter ? then ? different.... then boh!!